The Difference in Clinical Reasoning Competence between Pre-Clinical Students and Clinical Students on Pediatric Tropical Disease Cases

Pujiati Abbas Pujiati*  -  Pediatrics Departement of Medical Faculty of Sultan Agung Islamic University, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Introduction: Clinical reasoning is a thinking process happened when various informations gathered from clinical cases were given or met by medical students, and used for formulating diagnosis and solving patients problems. Experiences and material inputs are important factors affecting clinical reasoning. Various theories explained that students on pre-clinical and clinical rotation level are still on the novice stage, so it is possible to have similar stage on clinical reasoning. On the other hand, it was reported that there are differences in clinical reasoning on different academic stages. Objective: knowing the differences of clinical reasoning on preclinical students and clinical students.Method: observational study with cross sectional design. Respondents of this study were 120 students from medicine faculty of Sultan Agung Semarang University, comprised of: 60 preclinical students whom have been underwent tropical disease modul batch 2011 and 60 clinical rotation students on pediatric stage. Respondents answered 20 items questions in Script Concordance Test (SCT) form on pediatric tropical disease cases. SCT items were prepared by pediatricians, structures and contents were reviewed by medical education experts and concordanced by 10 experts of pediatric unit. Value differences between 2 groups were statistically analyzed using Mann Whitney U on SPSS 16.0, with acceptable error accepted level if p<0.05. Result: non parametric result test by Mann-whitney showed that mean score of SCT on preclinical group were lower (8,57;+ 1,81) than on clinical rotation students 11,49 (+ 1,98) p = 0,000. Conclusion: clinical reasoning competence measured by SCT is higher on clinical rotation students compared to pre clinical students.

Keywords: clinical reasoning competency; script concordance test (SCT); pre clinical students; clinical rotation students

  1. Brailovsky C, Charlin B, Beausoleil S, ,l., 2001. Measurement of clinical reflective capacity early in training as a predictor of clinical reasoning performance at the end of residency: an experimental study on the script concordance test. Medical Education; 35:430-436
  2. Charlin,B, Brailovsky C, Roy L, 2000. The Script Concordance Test: A Tool to Assess the Reflective Clinician. Teach Learn Med; 12(4),189-195
  3. Charlin B, Gagnon R, Pelletier J,2006. Assessment of clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty: the effect of variability within the reference panel.Medical Education; 40:848–854. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02541.x
  4. Cuthbert.L.1999. Expert/Novice differences in Diagnostic Medical Cognition–A Review of the Literature. Cognitive Science Research Paper.University of Sussex.1999
  5. Duggan, P.2007. Development of a Script Concordance Test using an Electronic Voting System, ergo, 2007. vol.1,no.1,pp.35–41
  6. Gandes R, Mc Aleer S (2008). Clinical reasoning of Indonesian medical students as measured by diagnostic thinking inventory. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education.vol.2,no.1.
  7. Groves, M, Scott, I, Alexander, H.2002. Assessing clinical reasoning: a method to monitor its development in a PBL curriculum, Medical Teacher,vol 24, No.5.507-515
  8. Humbert, A, l. 2011. Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre-clinical medical students, Medical Teacher; 33:472–477.
  9. Irfannudin.(2009). Knowledge and critical thinking skills increase clinical reasoning ability in urogenital disorders: a Universitas Sriwijaya Medical Faculty experience.Vol.l8,No.I
  10. Jensen,G.M.,Gwyer,J.,Shepard,K.F.,&Hack,L. M.(2000). Expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy,80(1), 28-43
  11. Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. 2012. Standar kompetensi dokter Indonesia 2012. http://inamc.or.id/download/Standar%20Kompetensi%20Dokter.pdf accesed on 5 mei 2013. Semarang
  12. Martin I G, Stark P, Jolly B. 2000. Benefiting from clinical experience: the influence of learning style and clinical experience on performance in undergraduate objective structure clinical examination. Medical Education; 34:530-4
  13. Osman H. 2005. Critical thinking in nursing practice. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center.
  14. Schuwirth,L. 2009. Is assessment of clinical reasoning still the Holy Grail?. Medical Education; 2009; 43:298–299

Open Access Copyright (c) 2015 Sains Medika : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sains Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan
is published by Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia.
Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang 50112
Website: https://fkunissula.ac.id/
Email: sainsmedika@unissula.ac.idsainsmedika@unissula.ac.id

ISSN: 2339-093X (Online) | 2085-1545 (Print)
DOI : 10.30659/sainsmed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps