Legal Review of the Position and Role of Dissenting Opinion and Concuring Opinion in the Decisions of Constitutional Court Judges

Hajir Alamsyah

Abstract


Constitutional Court Judges are state officials who have the authority to try the judicial process at the Constitutional Court at the first and final level whose decisions are final. The authority of the Constitutional Court is emphasized in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. However, in deciding on judicial review applications, Constitutional Court Judges are often found to have different views in interpreting the constitution so that dissenting opinions and concurring opinions arise in deciding cases. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal position and role of dissenting opinion and concurring opinion in the Indonesian legal system and how the judge's consideration process in making decisions at the Constitutional Court, the author raises the journal title "Legal Review of the Position and Role of Dissenting Opinion and Concuring Opinion in the Decisions of Constitutional Court Judges". The research method uses a normative legal approach, namely by examining primary materials consisting of the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 48 of 2009 on judicial power, Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court, Law No. 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 90 / PUU-XXI / 2023 and various official documents containing law, then reviewing secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, articles, research reports and so on. This study uses 2 models of approach, namely implemented with the Statute approach and the conceptual approach. The legal status related to dissenting opinion and concurring opinion is not explicitly regulated in the legal system in Indonesia, but is regulated in Article 14 paragraph (1), (2), (3) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning judicial power. Then regulated in Article 30 paragraph (2) and (3) of Law Number 5 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court. In the Constitutional Court Law Law Number 24 of 2003 it is regulated in Article 45 paragraph (6) and (10) concerning the Constitutional Court. The role of dissenting opinion and concurring opinion can be used as a reference for legal reform in Indonesia because it is an expert opinion from a constitutional court judge in interpreting the constitution. Therefore, the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 has binding legal force because it is ordered by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to have the authority to adjudicate at the first and final level whose decision is final.

Keywords


Dissenting Opinion, Conccuring Opinion, Judge's Decision

References


Abdul Rasyid Thalib, 2006,Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Impilkasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,

Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim, Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Andi Hamzah, 2008, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Bandung

Aziz Syamsuddin. 2011. Proses dan Teknik Penyusunan Undang-Undang, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Bagir Manan dan Kuntana Magnar, 1997 Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, revised ed. Alumni Bandung

Bagir Manan, 2009 ‘Dissenting Opinion dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia’ dalam Bagir Manan, Menegakkan Hukum: Suatu Pencarian,: Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia, Jakarta

Bagir Manan, Teori dan Politik Konstitusi, Yogyakarta, FH UII pres, 2003

Dahlan Thalib dkk, 2008, Teori dan Hukum Konstitusi, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,

Darji Darmodiharjo dan Shidarta, 1995, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filosafat Hukum Indonesia, Gramedia, Jakarta

Farid Wadji dan Suhrawardi K. Lubis, 2019 Etika Profesi Hukum, revised Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Ferdinand M. Manullang, 2007 Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan: Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat dan Antinomi Nilai, Buku Kompas Jakarta.

Hans Kelsen, Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara, Ctk. Keempat , Nusa Media, Bandung.

I Made Pasek Diantha, 2016, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Kencana, Jakarta

Mardian Wibowo, 2015 ”Menakar Konstitusionalitas Sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta

Saldi Isra, 2010, Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi: Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia, Rajawali Press, Jakarta,

Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi,

Imam Mahdi, 2011, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Teras, Yogyakarta,

Putusan MK No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Ketentuan Tambahan Pengalaman Menjabat Dari Keterpilihan Pemilu Dalam Syarat Usia Minimal Capres/Cawapres

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2012, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,

Lilik Mulyadi, 2009 Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia,: Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung

JURNAL

Ach Dlofirul Anam, 2022 “Landasan Aksiologi Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Sebuah Perkara Tinjauan Keadilan Substansif”, Jurnal An-Nawazil

Adena Fitri Puspita Sari dan Purwono Sungkono Raharjo, 2022.“Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator,” Souvereignty Vol. 1 Nomor. 4

Siti Malikhatun Badriyah, 2022, Sistem Penemuan Hukum dalam Masyarakat Prismatik Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,

Siti Aminah dan Uli Parulian Sihombing, 2011, Memahami Pendapat Berbeda (Dissenting Opinion) Putusan Uji Materiil UU Penodaan Agama, (The Indonesian Legal Resource Center, Jakarta,.

Indra Sukma Putra, Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti, Bintoro Adi Wicaksono, 2015 “Analisis Putusan Dissenting Opinion berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Pidana (KUHAP) Pada Perkara Penipuan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 2253 K/Pid/2012), Verstek, Vol 3, No 3,

Sunarmi 2007 “Dissenting Opinion sebagai Wujud Transparansi dalam Putusan Peradilan”. Jurnal Equality. Vol. 12 No. 2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.1221-1230

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: