Legal Analysis of Criminal Liability for Perpetrators of Theft Crimes Based on Victim Protection (Study of Decision Number: 406/Pid.B/2021/PN SMG)

Galih Adiamas Setyadi

Abstract


Theft is one of the crimes that often occurs in society. The factors that can cause theft are diverse. This act of stealing is considered a criminal behavior because it involves taking someone else's property without permission, and often results in losses for the victim. This thesis aims to study and analyze: First, the legal analysis of criminal liability for perpetrators of theft crimes based on victim protection. Second, the effectiveness of the implementation of criminal liability for perpetrators of theft crimes in providing protection for victims. This assessment is carried out objectively and subjectively. The approach method used is normative juridical, namely a library legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data only using deductive thinking methods. The writing specifications use descriptive analysis, the sources and types of data used are secondary data. The data collection method is by collecting data using secondary data collection methods. The problem is analyzed using the theory of criminal responsibility and legal effectiveness. The responsibility of the perpetrator of the crime of theft under aggravating circumstances in decision Number 406 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN Smg that the panel of judges decided his actions stating that the defendant ZH bin Alm Cik Saleh was legally proven and guilty of committing the crime of theft regulated and threatened in Article 362 of the Criminal Code with imprisonment of 1 (one) year each. The effectiveness of the criminal sanctions given to the convict based on Decision Number 406 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN Smg where the defendant was sentenced to 1 (one) year by the judge's decision. In viewing the effectiveness of criminal sanctions with the use of effectiveness theory, the author conducted an analysis with three studies of effectiveness theory, namely success in implementing the law, failure in implementing it and factors that influence it.

Keywords


Criminal Responsibility, Criminal Acts, Theft

References


Bambang Waloyu, 2008, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Jakarta: Sinar Garfika.

Jan s. Maringka, 2017, Reformasi Kejaksaan dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Muhammad Iqbal, Suhendar, dan Ali Imron, 2019, Hukum Pidana, Pamulang: Unpam Press.

Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Rusli Muhammad, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontenporer, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Alumni, 1986, Bandung.

Setyawati, dkk, 2015, Buku Seri Bahaya Narkotika Jilid I, Surakarta, Tirta Asih Jaya.

Simons, 2005. Leerboek Van Het Nederlands Strafrecht II, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Achmad Ali, 2010, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) & Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Volume I Pemahaman Awal, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Andre G. Mawey, “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum”, Manado: UNSRAT, Le Crimen Vol. V, No. 2, Tahun 2016, hlm. 83.

Andri Winjaya Laksana, “Tinjauan Hukum Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika Dengan Sistem Rehabilitasi”, Jurnal Hukum, Jurnal Penalaran Hukum Volume II No.1 Januari-April 2015.

Sanna Friani Manalu , Arta Rumiris Sipahutar , Sampe Raja Sinaga dan Mesias J.P ‎Sagala, Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Jenis Sabu-Sabu Dan Pil Ekstasi ‎Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum Pidana Dalam Putusan Nomor : 473/Pid.Sus/2015/Pt.Mdn, JURNAL ‎RECTUM, volume I, Nomor 2, Juli 2019




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.1171-1180

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: