Legal Implications of Narcotics Crimes Based on Restorative Justice (Case Study of Case Number 79/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mgg)
Abstract
Drug abuse is one of the greatest dangers that threatens the younger generation not only in Indonesia but throughout the world. Currently, the government is actively fighting drug abuse. To achieve the expected effectiveness of law enforcement and achieve the eradication of drug trafficking crimes, it is absolutely necessary, including firmness in the application of criminal sanctions for the perpetrators. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the application of criminal sanctions regarding Narcotics Crimes and Judges' Considerations in Handing Down Verdicts Against Perpetrators of Narcotics Crimes based on Restorative Justice Values. The approach method used is normative juridical, namely a legal literature study conducted by examining library materials or secondary data only using deductive thinking methods. The writing specifications use descriptive analysis, sources and types of data used are primary and secondary data. The data collection method is by collecting data using secondary data collection methods. The problem is analyzed using Gustav Radbruch's Legal Certainty Theory and Restorative Justice Theory. The Panel of Judges in the decision has applied criminal sanctions to the Defendant R.A.S by referring to Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Based on the theory of legal certainty according to Gustav Radbruch, which states that the law must meet the requirements of legal certainty, namely certainty in law and certainty in the application of law, the application of this criminal sanction can be considered as certainty in the application of law. The judge has sentenced the Defendant to 2 years and 4 months in prison, which is a sanction in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Thus, the judge has ensured that the criminal sanctions are applied fairly and in accordance with the provisions of the law, thus fulfilling the requirements of certainty in the application of the law according to Radbruch's theory. Based on the Case Study of Case Number 79/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mgg, the judge has considered three principles of restorative justice in making a decision. First, restorative justice that focuses on the recovery and improvement of victims, the judge has considered the social and psychological impacts caused by drug crimes on society and direct victims. Second, active participation of victims and parties involved, the judge has ensured that the judicial process involves the active participation of victims and parties involved to achieve fairer and more effective justice. Third, healing and recovery of victims, the judge has imposed a prison sentence of 2 years and 4 months on the defendant, which is considered a sufficient sanction to restore victims and prevent similar crimes in the future.
Keywords
References
Barda Nawawi Arief, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Ketiga, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2013.
Dikdik M. Arief dan Elisatris Gultom, Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
Kusno Adi, Diversi Sebagai Upaya Alternatif Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Oleh Anak, Cetakan Pertama, UMM Press, Malang, 2009.
Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2017.
Muhyar Fanani, Membumikan Hukum Langit, Yogyakarta, Tiara Wacana, 2008.
Sandika Dwi Nugroho, Arpangi, Tinjauan Yuridis Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Positif, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Volume 16 Nomor 4 , December 2021.
Syarif Mappiasse, Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim, Jakarta, 2015.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Criminal Code
Criminal Procedure Code
Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health;
Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police;
Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics;
Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power;
Law Number 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics;
Case Number 333/Pid.B/2022/PN.Smg.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.76-90
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: