Termination of Prosecution of Narcotics Crimes from the Pancasila Justice Perspective

Diyan Kurniawan

Abstract


The purpose of terminating the prosecution of narcotics crimes from the Pancasila justice perspective. The sociological approach method or socio-legal research, a research approach that examines the perceptions and legal behavior of people (humans and legal entities) that occur in the field. The results of the study show that the termination of prosecution of narcotics crimes from the Pancasila justice perspective is carried out as long as they can be categorized as addicts, abusers, victims of abuse, and drug dependency. Article 4 of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office Regulation Number 15 of 2020 stipulates that the public prosecutor has the authority to terminate prosecution based on restorative justice considering the interests of the victim and legal interests.


Keywords


Termination of Prosecution, Narcotics, Pancasila Justice.

References


Alfajri Firmansyah, Tinjauan Hukum Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Pemeriksaan Tambahan MenurutAsas Dominus Litis Berdasarkan Kuhap, Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol. 2, No. 1 Tahun 2020. Url:https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v2i1.19 diakses 19 November 2024.

Haposan Sahala Raja Sinaga, Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Narkotika Di Indonesia (Implementation Of Restorative Justice In Indonesian Narcotics Cases), Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.2. No.7 Tahun 2021. Url: https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com diakses 30 November 2024.

Gomgom Tp Siregar, Rudolf Silaban. “The Relevance of Criminal Close to the Modern Criminal Justice System”. Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4, (2022), Url : http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/27612 diakses 17 November 2024.

Zvi D. Gabbay, Justifying Restorative Justice: A Theoretical Justification for the Use of Restorative Justice Practices, Journal of Dispute Resolution Vol.205 Tahun 2015, Url : https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2005/iss2/4/ diakses 16 November 2024.

Abdulkadir Muhammad. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cet. I., Bandung:Citra Aditya Bakti.

M. Yahya Harahap. (2009). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Sinar grafika, Jakarta.

Nur Alim Rachim dan M. Aris Munandar .(2003). Aspek Hukum Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika, Penerbit KBM Indonesia, Yogyakarta.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (2009). Penegakan Hukum, Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Cetakan Kesatu, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Supriyadi Widodo Edyyono et al., (2017), Kertas Kerja: Memperkuat Revisi Undang-Undang Narkotika Indonesia Usulan Masyarakat Sipil, Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, Jakarta Selatan.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2012). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta:PT Raja Grafindo.

Tolib Effendi. (2013). Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perbandingan Komponen Dan Proses Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakara.

Yudi Latif (2014). Mata Air Keteladanan : Pancasila Dalam Perbuatan, Mizan, Jakarta.

Yudi Latif. (2011). Negara Paripurna : Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila, Gramedia, Jakarta

Yudi Latif (2011) Negara Paripurna : Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila, Gramedia, Jakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.881-890

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: