Analysis of Replacement Payments in Corruption Crimes Based on Justice
Abstract
The aim of this research is to find out and analyze the current regulations for paying replacement money in criminal acts of corruption, knowing and analyzing the implementation of paying replacement money in criminal acts of corruption based on the value of Justice. This legal research uses an empirical legal research approach. This research discusses additional punishment in the form of payment of compensation for criminal acts of corruption as an important instrument for recovering state losses resulting from corrupt acts. The crime of replacement money aims not only to return misused funds to the state treasury, but also to provide a deterrent effect to perpetrators of corruption. The implementation of this crime is based on the Corruption Eradication Law, with a direct payment mechanism by the convict or through auction of confiscated assets. However, its implementation is faced with challenges, such as lengthy legal processes, identification of state losses, and the tendency of convicts to choose light subsidiary prison sentences rather than paying compensation. This research emphasizes the importance of synergy between prosecutors, related agencies, and a transparent judicial process to overcome these obstacles. It is necessary to evaluate policies and regulations, including tightening subsidiary criminal provisions, to increase the effectiveness of recovering state losses and promote justice and prevent corruption. It is hoped that these findings can become a reference for improving the legal system in dealing with criminal acts of corruption.
Keywords
References
Adami Chazawi. Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia. Malang, Bayu Media Publishing, 2005, p. 354.
Artidjo Alkostar, Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Varia Peradilan, Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI), Tahun ke XXIII No. 275, October 2008
Astuti Nur Fadilla, Dkk, Pengembalian Aset Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Maluku Melalui Uang Pengganti, Jurnal Litigasi, 24, 2023, p. 265.
Caroline Kasemetan, Implementasi Sanksi Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Universitas Atmajaya, 2014, p. 7
Edi Setiadi dan Kristian, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2017, p.
Efi Lalila Kholis, Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi, Jakarta: Solusi Publishing, (2010), p.5.
eni Kurnia Illahi, Optimalisasi Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad), Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol 6 Nomor 1 February 2023, p. 35-56
Evans Emanuel Sinulingga, Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Mekanisme Gugatan Perdata, Lex Administratum, Vol. V, No. 4, 2017, p. 117.
Evi Hartanti, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta, sinar Grafika, 2008, hlm, 1. Ridwan, Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Peran Serta Masyarakat, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2014, p. 385-399.
Laurensius Arliman, Mewujudkan Penegakan Hukum Yang Baik Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum, Jurnal Al Qadau, Vol 8 No 1, 2021, p. 509-534
Lola Yustrisia, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistle Blower Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Menara Ilmu, IX Jilid 1 No. 75, 2017, p. 95.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990, p. 33.
Sudarwan Denim, Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif, Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 2012, p. 62.
Surat Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor : B012/A/Cu.2/01/2013 tertanggal 18 Januari 2013 tentang Kebijakan Akuntansi Dan Pedoman Penyelesaian Atas Piutang Uang Pengganti Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia 1
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2010, p. 48
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.641-650
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
