Effectiveness of State Financial Returns as a Settlement of Corruption Crimes Based on Benefit (Case Study: Tanjungpinang District Attorney's Office)
Abstract
State financial losses resulting from deviant or unlawful management of state finances must be returned so that state finances are in their original state to finance the implementation of state government in order to achieve state goals. The aim of this research is to determine and analyze the effectiveness of returning state finances as a resolution of benefit-based criminal acts of corruption. To overcome obstacles and provide solutions for returning state finances as a solution to criminal acts of corruption. The approach method used in preparing the thesis is empirical juridical research. The specifications in this research are analytical descriptive. Types and sources of data using primary data and secondary data. The data analysis used in this research is qualitative analysis. The results of this research are (1) The effectiveness of returning state finances as a benefit-based resolution of criminal acts of corruption relies on achieving the greatest benefits for society through recovery of state losses and strict law enforcement. Effectiveness factors according to Soerjono Soekanto, such as legal factors: Article 18 of the Corruption Law, which regulates additional punishment in the form of replacement money, is often not equipped with detailed mechanisms regarding asset tracking, confiscation, and execution; Law enforcement factors: bureaucratic obstacles with the BPK/BPKP in the audit process for corruption defendants; Cultural factors: permissive culture towards corruption that is still developing in society; Facilities and infrastructure factors: The prosecutor's office also does not have facilities and infrastructure related to crimes in banking related to criminal acts of corruption; as well as community factors: low community participation in eradicating criminal acts of corruption. (2) Obstacles in efforts to recover state finances as a resolution of criminal acts of corruption at the Tanjung Pinang District Prosecutor's Office include internal factors such as ineffective implementation of sanctions and obstacles in executing decisions by prosecutors, as well as external factors such as unclear legal regulations and low public participation. To overcome this obstacle, legal revisions are needed that adapt sanctions to the impact of crime, strengthening law enforcement capacity through training and technology, as well as public education to increase public awareness and support.
Keywords
References
A Mahmud, 2021. Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,
A. Mahmud, Problematika asset recovery dalam pengembalian kerugian negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2018
Abdul Wahid, Pemberlakuan Hukum Ekstradisi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan UNCAC (United Nation Convention against Corruption) Untuk Melawan Tindakan Korupsi, Mayoritas Negara Telah Sepakat Untuk Mencegah Dan, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2023,
Ahmad, K., dan Djanggih, H. Batasan Penerapan Asas Persidangan Terbuka untuk Umum dalam Siaran Persidangan Pidana oleh Media. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2017,
Amiruddin Dan Zainal Asikin. 2003, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Faisal Rachman Januar, Konstruksi Hukum Tuntutan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara Terhadap Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Diputus Bebas, Lex Lata Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2022,
Fockema. A.S.J. 1951, Rechtsgeleerd Handwoordenboek, diterjemahkan oleh Walter Siregar, Bij J. B. Wolter uitgeversmaat schappij. N. V. Groningen. Jakarta,
Ifrani, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa, Al ’Adl Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2017,
Indonesia Corruption Watch, Catatan Akhir Tahun Indonesia Corruption Watch 2017 https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/catatan-akhir-tahun-indonesia-corruption-watch-2017
Indonesia Corruption Watch, Laporan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2021, https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Laporan%20Tren%20Penindakan%20Kasus%20Korupsi%20Tahun%202021.pdf
Indonesia Corruption Watch, Results Of Monitoring Of The 2020 Corruption Verdicts https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Tren%20Vonis%202020%20%28versi%20english%29.pdf
Juangga Saputra Dalimunthe. Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dikuasai Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2020,
Jumroh and Kosasih, 2015, Pengembalian Aset Negara Dari Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. CV. Zigie Utama, Bengkulu,
Kalimatul Jumroh and Ade Kosasih, 2019, Pengembalian Aset Negara Dari Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi, CV. Zigie Utama, Bengkulu,
Muh. Djafar Saidi (et. al), 2017, Hukum Keuangan Negara Teori Dan Praktik, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Muhammad Nur Aflah et al., Kedudukan Hukum Aparatur Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dalam Pengawasan Pengadaan Barang / Jasa Pemerintah, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol. 4, no. 2 (2021),
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Refki Saputra, Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Nonconviction Based Asset Forfeiture) Dalam Ruu Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia, Integritas, Vol. 3, no. 1, 2017,
Sudarto, 1977, Hukum Pidana 1, Alumni, Bandung,
Thalib, H., Ramadhan, A., dan Djanggih, H. The Corruption Investigation In The Regional Police of Riau Islands, Indonesia. Rechtsidee, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2017,
Yuda Musatajab dan Mulyadi A. Tajuddin, Uang Pengganti Sebagai Alternatif Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Restorative Justice, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2018,
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.631-640
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
