Restorative Justice Policy Analysis in Eradicating Corruption
Abstract
This study analyzes the application of the principle of restorative justice (RJ) in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, both in the context of current law (ius constitutum) and for the development of future policies (ius constituendum). Through a normative juridical approach, this study identifies conflicts of norms and legal principles that hinder the implementation of restorative justice and offers normative solutions to overcome them. The results of the study indicate that the current application of restorative justice is still limited by the retributive legal framework, lack of coordination between institutions, and community resistance. However, restorative justice has the potential to complement the retributive approach by emphasizing the recovery of state losses and social reconciliation. This study recommends a revision of the Corruption Law, the preparation of implementing regulations, and public education to support a more effective implementation of restorative justice.
Keywords
References
Adji, D. S. (2005). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1997). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Green, T. A. (2005). The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamzah, A. (1994). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. W. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Restorative Justice. New York: Routledge.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (1997). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (2001). Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation, and Circles. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.
Remmelink, J. (2003). Hukum Pidana: Komentar atas Pasal-pasal Terpenting dari KUHP Belanda dan Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shiner, B. (2005). The Law of Theft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skelton, A., & Batley, M. (2006). Charting Progress, Mapping the Future: Restorative Justice in South Africa. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sullivan, R., Hogue, K. T., & Decker, G. (2016). Criminal Law: Model Problems and Outstanding Answers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tirtaamidjaja, M. H. (1955). Pokok-pokok Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru – Van Hoeve.
Van Apeldoorn, L. J. (2006). Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar (Shidarta, Ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: Restorative Justice for Our Times. Scottdale: Herald Press.
Bere, E. J., Leo, R. P., & Wilhelmus, B. V. (2023). Penerapan Restorative Justice serta Hambatan-Hambatan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana KDRT oleh Suami. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 12(6), 1-5.
Daly, K., & Hayes, H. (2001). Restorative Justice and Conferencing in Australia. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 186(1), 1-6.
Habib, A. (2020). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crime Cases as an Effort to Repay State Losses.
Hardi, S. (2020). "Koordinasi Antar-Lembaga Penegak Hukum dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(2), 215-232.
Hermanus, R., Maramis, R. A., & Senewe, E. V. (2023). Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penipuan Berlatar Belakang Bisnis di Kejaksaan Negeri Minahasa Selatan. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 8083-8091.
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127-144.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Guidelines for Law Enforcement in Courts. Retrieved from https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712.
Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik Tahun 2021. Jakarta: Ombudsman RI, hal. 32.
Prasetyo, T. (2021). Jurisdictional Challenges in Implementing Restorative Justice in Corruption Cases. Journal of Legal Studies, 45(2), 123-145.
Ramadhan, M. R., & Indawati, Y. (2024). Penerapan Restorative Justice Berdasarkan Asas Cepat, Sederhana, dan Biaya Ringan pada Masyarakat. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 17927-17940.
Ramadhani, F. W. (2024). Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Berdasarkan Peraturan Kepolisian RI Nomor 8 Tahun 2021. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 9-9.
Siregar, D. (2019). Inconsistencies in the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Cases. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 12(4), 233-250.
Thorik, A., Anggraeni, A. N., Hubi, Z. B., Darmawan, A., & Kismala, T. P. (2024). Perbandingan Konsep Restorative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam Dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.Nomos: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum,4(3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v4i1.2100
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023/index/nzl.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Vienna: UNODC.
Utomo, A. (2020). Dilemmas in the Enforcement of Corruption Laws and Restorative Justice. Law and Justice Journal, 5(3), 89-104.
Wibisono, H. (2022). Public Skepticism Towards Restorative Justice in Corruption Cases. Journal of Social Justice, 14(2), 67-85.
World Bank. (2000). Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Peraturan perundang – undangan
Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Republik Indonesia. (2001). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 31 Tahun 1999.
Al-Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqarah: 179, 188.
Al-Qur'an, Surah Al-Ma'idah: 38.
Al-Qur'an, Surah An-Nisa: 58, 128.
Al-Qur'an, Surah Al-Hujurat: 10.
Hadis riwayat Bukhari dan Muslim.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.541-550
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
