Effectiveness of Termination of Prosecution Implementation in Handling Minor Crimes Based on Restorative Justice (Case Study at the Central Java High Prosecutor's Office)
Abstract
Minor Crimes are a type of crime that can be classified into the examination of minor crimes. The objectives of this study are: 1) to determine and analyze the implementation of termination of prosecution in handling minor crimes today; 2) to determine and analyze the weaknesses in the implementation of termination of prosecution in handling minor crimes today; 3) to determine and analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of termination of prosecution in handling minor crimes based on restorative justice. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with a descriptive analytical research method. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problems are analyzed using the theory of justice, Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory and progressive legal theory. The results of the study concluded that: 1) The implementation of restorative justice in handling minor criminal acts that in the settlement with restorative is carried out with the provision that peace has begun between the perpetrator, victim, perpetrator's family and community leaders who are in dispute with or without compensation after reaching a peace agreement the parties make a peace agreement signed by the related parties; 2). Obstacles to the implementation of restorative justice in handling minor criminal acts include legal factors, community factors, facility factors, law enforcement factors, cultural factors. From a legal perspective, restorative justice in minor criminal cases has not been clearly regulated and this is an obstacle for law enforcement officers in implementing restorative justice. From a law enforcement perspective, the low understanding of Polri members who are minimal about restorative justice is something that affects the implementation of the restorative justice concept. From a facility perspective, the low level of socialization from the police to the community is because the budget provided is insufficient, while other priority programs must be implemented. From a community perspective, the community does not comply with the law because of many factors that exist in the community/social conditions such as low trust from the community towards law enforcement officers. From the cultural factor that there is a mindset that crimes must be repaid and given punishment to deter perpetrators of crimes. Community habits such as vigilante behavior against perpetrators of minor crimes are obstacles in implementing restorative justice.
Keywords
References
Leonardo O. A. Pandensolang , 2015, Kajian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ringan Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Lex Crimen Vol. IV/No. 1/Jan-Mar/2015 24, Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
Edward James Sinaga, “Layanan Hukum Legislasi Dalam Upaya Memberikan Kepastian Hukum,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 1 (2019).
Mardjono Reksodiputro, Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Komisi Hukum Nasional, tanggal 09 Desember 2009.
Sefriani, Urgensi Rekonseptualisasi dan Legislasi Keadilan Restoratif di Indonesia, Jurnal Rechts Vinding Volume 2 nomor 2, Agustus 2013.
Iklimah Dinda and Indiyani Adiesta, “Penerapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Inovasi Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Ringan,” | INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON LAW, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES 2, no. 2 (2021): 143–70, https://doi.org/10.19184/idj.v12i2.25842.
Mansyur Ridwan, 2010, Mediasi Penal Terhadap Perkara KDRT (Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga), Yayasan Gema Yustisia Indonesia, Jakarta.
United Nations (PBB), Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes, United Nations Publication, New York, 2006.
Scheb, John M. dkk, Criminal Law and Procedure, 6th Edition, Thomson Learning, Belmont, 2008.
Barda Nawawi Arief, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana,” in Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1996).
Mc Cold and Wachtel, Restorative Practices, (The International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP), 2003).
Eman Sulaeman, 2008, Delik Perizinaan, Walisongo Pers, Surabaya.
Restorative Justice in new Zealand : A model for U.S Criminal Justice, (Wellington : Ian Axford fellowship, 2001).
Yoachim Agus Tridiatno, Keadilan Restoratif. (Yogyakarta : Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2015).
Achmad Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence), (Jakarta, Kencana, 2009).
Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial (Bandung: PT. Alumni, 1983).
Soerjono Soekanto, Kesadaran Hukum Dan Kepatuhan Hukum (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1983).
Achjani Zulfa, Eva. Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. UI Press, Depok, 2011.
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, BP Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2016.
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana: Edisi Revisi 2008, PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Kedelapan, Jakarta: Renika Cipta, 2008.
Andi Zainal Abidin Farid, Hukum Pidana I, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Mediasi Penal: Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Di Luar Pengadilan, Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2008.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.221-230
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: