Criminal Law Policy in Efforts to Overcome Traffic Accidents Based on Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code
Abstract
This study on Criminal Law Policy in Efforts to Overcome Traffic Accidents Based on Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code aims to determine and analyze criminal law policies in efforts to overcome traffic accidents based on restorative justice in current positive law and the New Criminal Code. The approach method used is normative juridical. Data collection through literature and documentation studies. Data analysis is carried out descriptively qualitatively. The study concludes that criminal law policies in efforts to overcome traffic accidents based on restorative justice in current positive law are still sectoral in each law enforcement agency, namely at the level of investigation, prosecution and examination in court hearings have their respective legal bases. The implementation of restorative justice has only received a firm legal umbrella for all law enforcement officers in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Regulation System in the form of an obligation to implement diversion efforts at all levels of criminal justice for crimes committed by children, namely the level of investigation, prosecution and Examination in Court Hearings. The provisions in question were followed by the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The criminal law policy in an effort to overcome traffic accidents based on restorative justice in the New Criminal Code in the form of the cessation of prosecution authority if the criminal case has been resolved outside the judicial process and the judge's forgiveness or rechterlijke pardon or judicial pardon or dipensa de pena is the idea of forgiveness and forgiveness of the judge. This concept gives the judge the authority to forgive and not impose criminal penalties or actions even though the crime and error have been proven. However, the New Criminal Code does not provide detailed regulations regarding the authority to apply restorative justice to investigators. The New Criminal Code only provides an opportunity for the settlement of criminal cases outside the court which can nullify the authority of prosecution. However, the New Criminal Code is a fundamental basis for the implementation of restorative justice in the legal system in Indonesia.
Keywords
References
Atmasasmita, R. 2012. Teori Hukum Integratif: Rekonstruksi terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif. Genta Publishing, Jakarta.
Bagir Manan, 2008, Retorative Justice (Suatu Perkenalan),dalam Refleksi Dinamika Hukum Rangkaian Pemikiran dalam dekade Terakhir, Perum Percetakan Negara RI, Jakarta.
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2016. “Pembaharuan KUHP dan KUHAP Tiada Ujung: Nasib RKUHP dan RKUHAP”. Seminar Nasional Mahupiki.
---------------------------, 2008. Mediasi Penal: Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Luar Pengadilan. Pustaka Magister. Jakarta.
C. T. Lesmana, “Implementasi Mediasi Penal dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Studi Kasus Pada Satreskrim Polres Sukabumi Kota,” Rechten, vol. 2, no. 2, 2020.
Darji Darmodiharjo dan Shidarta, 2008, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta
E.Y. Kanter dan S.R. Sianturi, 1982, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Alumni AHM- PTHM, Jakarta.
E. Utrecht, 1962, Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia, Balai Buku Ichtiar, Jakarta.
Farida, A. 2016. “Teori Hukum Pancasila Sebagai Sintesa Konvergensi Teori-Teori Hukum Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Perspektif, 11(1).
H. Widodo and F. P. Disantara, “Problematik Kepastian Hukum Darurat Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19,” J. Suara Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 197, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.26740/jsh.v3n1.
Henny Saida Flora, “Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia: A Prophetic Legal Study”, Rechtsidee Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December.
Hiariej, E. O. 2015. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Jakarta.
Hariyanto, D. R. S., & S, P. Y. 2019. “Mediasi Penal dalam Ius Constitutum dan Ius Contituendum di Indonesia”. Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, 13(1).
Henny Saida Flora, “Keadilan Restoratif pada KUHP Baru di Indonesia: Suatu Studi Hukum Profetik”, RECHTSIDE: Criminal Law, Vol. X, No. 2, (2022), hlm. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.836.
Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Program Kerja Prioritas Kejaksaan RI Tahun 2021. Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/agenda_kegiatan.php?id=695
Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar, “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia”, Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 51 No.2, April 2022.
Purwadi Arianto. 2013. “Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum Oleh POLRI (Suatu Kajian dalam Penerapan Hukum Pidana)” Seminar Nasional Dir Reskrim Polda Jateng. Semarang.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2009, Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta
------------------, “Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Hukum di Era Reformasi”, makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Menggugat Pemikiran Positivisme di Era Reformasi, PDIH, UNDIP, Semarang, 22 Juli 2000.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1995, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Setyo Utomo,”Sistem Pemidanaan dalam Hukum Pidana yang Berbasis Restorative Justie” makalah disampaikan dalam kegiatan Focus Group Discussion (FGD) tentang “Politik Perumusan Ancaman Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Diluar KUHP”, diselenggarakan oleh Pusat Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional /BPHN Departement Hukum dan HAM, di Jakarta, tanggal 21 Oktober 2010
Sudarto. 1979. Suatu Dilema Pembaharuan Sistem Pidana Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
T. Subarsyah Sumadikara, 2010, Penegakan Hukum (Sebuah Pendekatan Politik Hukum dan Politik Kriminal), Kencana Utama, Bandung.
United Nations, 2006, Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes, United Nations Publication, New York.
Viktimologi, www.replaz.blogspot.com
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.201-210
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: