The Criminal Disparity in Special Criminal Cases on Narcotics at Karanganyar State Court

Adela Falafiona Magaba, Bismar Siregar

Abstract


The disparity of criminal decisions has the meaning of unequal punishment of convicts in the same case or cases with almost the same level of crime, whether committed jointly or not without justifiable basis. This study aims to find out and analyze the basis for consideration of judges in imposing criminal decisions on perpetrators of narcotics crimes at the Karanganyar District Attorney's Office; Knowing the factors that influence the judge's decision against the perpetrators of criminal acts, especially those who violate Article 112 paragraph 1 of 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. The data used is secondary data in the form of a judge's decision. The analytical approach used is the case approach and the concept of criminal law. The results of this study indicate that in deciding cases judges use evidence as stated in the Criminal Procedure Code. The factors that influence the judge's decision include three things, namely: the legal factor itself, the perpetrator factor and the judge concerned.

Keywords


Decision; Disparity; Narcotics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Wahid and Muhammad Irfan, 2001, Protection of Sexual Violence, Advocacy for Women's Human Rights, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Abdurrachman, Hamidah, et al "Disparity in Judge Decisions in Drug Cases". Journal of Pandecta Vol 7, No 2, 2012.

Amirudin and Zainal Asikin, 2004, Introduction to Legal Research Methods, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Bismar Siregar et al, 2007, Law and Children's Rights, Rajawali, Jakarta.

I Dewa Putu Gede Anom Danujaya, “Model Formulation of the Criminal System for Narcotics in Indonesia, Journal of Daulat Hukum Vol 1, No.1 March, 2018.

Irwansyah, 2021, Legal Research, Choice of Methods & Article Writing Practice, Mirra Buana Media, Yogyakarta.

Lailatul Nur Hasanah and Sri Endah Wahyuningish. The Application Of Justice Principles Of Rapid Simple Fee In Criminal Justice System In The State Court (Case Study in State court of Pati). Journal of Sovereign Law Volume 2 Issue 4, December (2019). url :http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/8353/3910 accessed 2 January 2023.

Maidin Gultom, 2008, Legal Protection of Children, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Maidin Gultom, 2014, Legal Protection of Children (In the Indonesian Child Criminal Justice System), Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Muhammad Joni and Zulchaina Z Tanamas, 1999, Aspects of Child Protection in the Perspective of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir, 2004, Law and Legal Research, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Nasriana, 2011, Criminal Law Protection for Children in Indonesia, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Roswati Devi,Sri Endah Wahyuningsih and Umar Ma'ruf.Law Enforcement Of Giving Restitution For Victims Of Trafficking In The State Court Of Central Jakarta.Journal of Sovereign Law Volume 2 Issue 4, December (2019).Url:http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/8363/3896accessed 2 January 2023.

Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, 2003, Normative Legal Research; A Brief Overview, Seventh Edition, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. "Legal Protection of Children as Victims of Decency Crimes in Current Positive Criminal Law".Unissula Law Renewal JournalVolume III No. 2 May-August 2016.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “Model for the Development of Criminal Law Principles in the Criminal Code Based on the Values of Belief in the One and Only Godâ€.Journal of Sovereign LawVol 2, No 2, 2018.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. Legal Protection for Children as Victims of Decency Crimes in Current Positive Criminal Law. Journal of Legal ReformVol 3, No 2 (2016). url :http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1407/1080 accessed 2 January 2023.

Sutedjo wagiati, Melani, 2013, Criminal Law, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

WJS Poerwadar Minta, 2003, Indonesian General Dictionary, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.1.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: