Kinerja Pelayanan Petikemas Di Pelabuhan: Komparasi Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Surabaya Dan Pelabuhan Di Asia

Dwi Cahaya Widiyono, Artiningsih Artiningsih

Abstract


The focus of this paper is to evaluate the container services at Port of Tanjung Perak and compare it with other ports in Asia. A list of twenty (20) attributes is used as an assessment indicator with a five-point Likert scale, then analyzed using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) matrixes to measure service quality from users perspective. The results of the analysis addressed the CSI value of this study was 69.21% which refers to the service of the Port of Tanjung Perak Surabaya included in the category of satisfied. The IPA matrixes of the Port of Tanjung Perak confirm that three attributes were the main priorities for improved performance, namely related to congestion at the port, efficiency on-dock operation of containers at port and integration into intermodal transport system. In the ‘Assurance’ dimension, Port of Tanjung Perak is in the fourth position, above the Shanghai Port in China. In the ‘Tangible’, ‘Relability’, ‘Emphaty’ and ‘Responsiveness’ dimensions,  Port of Tanjung Perak still needs to make continous improvements.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyality: The Key to Great Profitability. New York: American Management Association.

Budi, T. P. (2006). SPSS 13.0 Terapan; Riset Statistik Parametrik. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset.

Dawes, J. (2002). Five Point vs Eleven Point Scales: Does It Make Difference To Data Characteristics? Australasian Journal of Market Research, 10(1), 1–17.

Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.

Dwarakish, G. S., & Salim, A. M. (2015). Review on the Role of Ports in the Development of a Nation. Aquatic Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.040

Jafari, H., Saeidi, N., & Karim Karimi, M. (2013). Importance-performance analysis of port’s services quality form perspective of containerized liner shipping. Management Science Letters, 3(6), 1743–1750. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2013.05.008

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2015). Manajemen Pemasaran (13th ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Lee, P. T.-W., & Hu, K.-C. (2012). Evaluation of the Service Quality of Container Ports by Importance-Performance Analysis. Int. J. Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2012.047479

Likert, R. (1932). Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/doi:10.2307/1250495

Munim, Z. H., & Schramm, H.-J. (2018). The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-018-0027-0

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL : A multiple- Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pham, T. Y., & Yeo, G. T. (2019). Evaluation of Transshipment container terminals’ service quality in Vietnam: From the shipping companies’ perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11051503

Prasetyo, S. A., Wicaksono, A., & Anwar, M. R. (2014). Evaluasi Sistem Logistik di Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Surabaya. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 8(2), 113–120.

Riyanto, A. H., & Riyanto, B. (2015). Analisis Peningkatan Pelayanan Stasiun Bogor Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Jasa Kereta Api dengan Metode Importance Performance Analysis ( IPA ). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 11(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v11i4.11549

Supriyono. (2013). Analisa Kinerja Terminal Petikemas di Tanjung Perak Surabaya ( Study Kasus : PT . Terminal Petikemas Surabaya ). Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 19(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v19i1.7838

Syarifuddin, M. F., Musadieq, M. Al, & Yulianto, E. (2016). Pentingnya Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Bagi Perekonomian Jawa Timur ( Studi pada PT . PELINDO III Tanjung Perak Surabaya ). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 35(1), 172–178.

Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.

Tjiptono, F. (2015). Strategi Pemasaran (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Ugboma, C., Ibe, C., & Ogwude, I. C. (2004). Service quality measurements in ports of a developing economy: Nigerian ports survey. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 14(6), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520410569829

Ugboma, C., Ogwude, I. C., Ugboma, O., & Nnadi, K. (2007). Service quality and satisfaction measurements in Nigerian ports: An exploration. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830701539073

Ugboma, C., Ugboma, O., & Damachi, B. (2009). A comparative assessment of service quality perspectives and satisfaction in ports: evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2009.024494

Yamit, Z. (2004). Manajemen Kualitas Produk dan Jasa (Yogyakarta). Ekonesia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jpsa.v17i2.7915

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.