Exploring the Pattern of Happiness in Indonesia Based on Public Green Spaces

Baiq Rindang Aprildahani*    -  Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Indonesia
Nela Agustin Kurnianingsih  -  Institut Teknologi Sumatera
Surya Tri Esthi Wira Hutama  -  Institut Teknologi Sumatera
Chrisna Trie Hadi Permana  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

(*) Corresponding Author

ABSTRACT

Happiness may be one of the most important pillars of life for people. The recent Indonesia’s happiness index has been measured by The Indonesia’s National Statistics Bureau (BPS) in 2021. The happiness index is composed by 19 indicators, which grouped into 3 dimensions, namely the dimensions of life satisfaction, feelings, and meaning of life. However, the presence of green spaces is not related to one of them. Meanwhile, there are three broad areas of research on happy cities: social determinants of well-being, economic determinants of well-being, and environmental determinants of well-being. One of the environmental determinants of well-being is the presence of green spaces. Many studies have shown that people who live in areas with more green spaces have less stress and emotional pressure, as well as a greater sense of happiness and satisfaction. This study aims to examine the relationship between the happiness index and the amount of public green spaces in Indonesia even though the happiness index measurement does not involve green spaces indicators. This study contributes by integrating spatial analysis with subjective well-being metrics in Indonesia’s urban policy context. The method used is simple linear regression analysis to determine the direction of influence and its magnitude. Data and information were collected from secondary sources. The results show that the area of public green spaces has positive effect to the happiness index even in Indonesia. It is suggest the need for integrating green infrastructure in happiness indicators and spatial planning programs.

Keywords: Happy City, Urban Happiness, Green Spaces, Happiness Index, Indonesia

 

ABSTRAK

Kebahagiaan mungkin merupakan salah satu pilar terpenting dalam hidup manusia. Indeks kebahagiaan Indonesia yang terbaru diukur oleh Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) pada tahun 2021. Indeks kebahagiaan disusun berdasarkan 19 indikator yang dikelompokkan ke dalam 3 dimensi, yaitu dimensi kepuasan hidup, perasaan, dan makna hidup. Namun, keberadaan ruang terbuka hijau tidak terkait dengan salah satunya. Sementara itu, ada tiga area besar penelitian tentang kota bahagia: determinan sosial dari kesejahteraan, determinan ekonomi dari kesejahteraan, dan determinan lingkungan dari kesejahteraan. Salah satu faktor lingkungan yang memengaruhi kesejahteraan adalah keberadaan ruang hijau. Banyak penelitian telah menunjukkan bahwa orang yang tinggal di daerah dengan lebih banyak ruang hijau memiliki lebih sedikit stres dan tekanan emosional, serta rasa bahagia dan kepuasan yang lebih besar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah hasil indeks kebahagiaan yang diukur oleh BPS Indonesia berhubungan dengan keberadaan RTH meskipun pengukuran indeks kebahagiaan tidak melibatkan indikator RTH. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi dengan mengintegrasikan analisis spasial dengan indikator kebahagiaan yang subjektif dalam konteks kebijakan perkotaan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier sederhana untuk mengetahui arah pengaruh dan besarannya. Data dan informasi dikumpulkan dari sumber sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa memang benar luas RTH publik berpengaruh terhadap indeks kebahagiaan bahkan di Indonesia dan berpengaruh positif. Oalh karena itu, disarankan untuk mengintegrasikan infrastruktur hijau ke dalam indikator pengukuran kebahagiaan dan program perencanaan ruang.

Kata kunci: Kota Bahagia, Ruang Terbuka Hijau, Indeks Kebahagiaan, Indonesia

  1. Abdollahpour, S. S., Sharifi, E., & Ghazi, R. (2021). Evaluation of happy city indicators in affordable housing projects, case study: mehr housing projects, aftab town, the city of parand, tehran, iran. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development C: Planning and Design Implementation, Vol.9 No.3, 103-127. ISSN: 2187-3666 (online). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14246/irspsdc.9.3_103.
  2. Alita, D., Putra, A. D., & Darwis, D. (2021). Analysis of classic assumption test and multiple linear regression coefficient test for employee structural office recommendation. JCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.65586.
  3. Bakhtiari, B., Shahabian, P., & Behzadfar, M. (2023). Evaluation the influential factors in creating a happy city (Case Study: Rudehen city). Urban Manage Energy Sustainability, 4(4): 110-124. DOI: 10.22034/JUMES.2024.2009459.1156.
  4. Dadvand P, Bartoll X, Basagaña X, Dalmau-Bueno A, Martinez D, Ambros A, Cirach M, Triguero-Mas M, Gascon M, Borrell C, & Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. (2016). Green spaces and general health: roles of mental health status, social support and physical activity. Environ Int 91:161–167 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029.
  5. De Vries S, van Dillen SME, Groenewegen PP, & Spreeuwenberg P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Soc Sci Med 94:26–33 10.
  6. Eisazadeh, Nasim & Vahdani, Hasan. (2017). The role of urban spaces and structures in increasing the social vitality of citizens with an emphasis on urban design approaches. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, Vol 17(3&4), DOI: 10.18311/jeoh/2017/v17i3&4/18296 94-103.
  7. https://countryeconomy.com/demography/world-happiness-index/indonesia. Indonesia-World Happiness Index (accessed on November 2024)
  8. Jabbar, M., Yusoff, M.M. and Shafie, A., 2021. Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: Asystematic review. GeoJournal, pp.1-19.
  9. Jennings V and Bamkole O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(3):452
  10. Kwon Oh-Hyun, Inho Hong, & Meeyoung Cha. (2021). Urban green space andhappiness in developed countries. EPJDataScience 10:28 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00278-7.
  11. MacKerron G, and Mourato S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Glob Environ Change 23:992–1000 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010.
  12. Mirzaei, S., and Zangiabadi, A. (2021). Studying and complying dimensions, indicators and variables related to a happy city. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.14246/IRSPSDA.9.2_94.
  13. Montgomery, Charles. (2013). Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design. Penguin Books: UK.
  14. Pouso, S., Borja, Á., Fleming, L. E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., White, M. P., & Uyarra, M. C. (2021). Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health. The Science of the total environment, 756, 143984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143984.
  15. Republik Indonesia Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Indeks Kebahagiaan 2021
  16. Republik Indonesia Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2021). Ruang Terbuka Hijau 2021 https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/public/rth
  17. Republik Indonesia Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2022 Tentang Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau.
  18. Republik Indonesia Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 5 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kawasan Perkotaan.
  19. Republik Indonesia Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang
  20. Republik Indonesia Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang
  21. Rugel EJ, Carpiano RM, Henderson SB, & Brauer M. (2019). Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region. Environ Res 171:365–377.
  22. Samavati, S. & Ranjbar, E. (2017). The effect of physical stimuli on citizens' happiness in urban environments: the case of the pedestrian area of the historical part of tehran. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health 2:2.
  23. Veenhoven, Ruut. (2017). Livability Theory, In: Micha los A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and WellـBeing Research, Springer, 3645-364.
  24. White, M. P., Alcock, I., Wheeler, B. W., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? a fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science, 24(6), 920-928. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464659.
  25. World Health Organization. (2012). Health indicators of sustainable cities in the context of the rio+20 un conference on sustainable development. WHO/HSE/PHE/7.6.2012f.
  26. World Health Organization. (2017). Urban green spaces: a brief for action. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Jurnal Planologi
Published by Pusat Studi Planologi Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, in collaboration with Asosiasi Sekolah Perencanaan Indonesia.
Jl. Kaligawe Raya KM. 4 Semarang, Indonesia
Phone: +6212345678
Email: jurnalplanologi@unissula.ac.id

View My Stats

e-ISSN: 1829-9172

p-ISSN: 2615-5257

DOI : 10.30659/japs

Creative Commons License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps