Binov Handitya, Jarot Jati Bagus Suseno


Pros and cons of opinion that enlivened the government’s plan related to the omnibus law, among those who supported the government’s plan, stated that the omnibus law was the right solution to address the overlapping issues of several laws and regulations in Indonesia. But the opponents or contra think that the omnibus law plan is considered as an effort to delegitimize the rights of each sector of the nation’s life, especially concerning labor and other sectors that can be affected due to their enactment. The problem in writing this paper is how is omibus law in terms of advantages and disadvantages of the legal codification system in Indonesia? Codification and omnibus law systems are systematic and integrated written patterns of norms for written regulations based on the principle of popular sovereignty with the formation of laws as a product of political approval or the highest legislative act under the law basis through people’s representative institutions whose elaboration is further stipulated by executive acts by the implementing agency of the law or branch of executive power. Omnibus law is a product of the Act that can revoke or amend several existing laws that can be scattered in several regulations, then streamlined in one Act to better target the solution to a conflict between government administrators and regulations legislation with specific objectives to improve the investment climate and as a guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection for policy makers. Even though the aim is good, it must still be considered in terms of advantages, that is, there are efficiencies and shortcomings that allow for legal deviations in our legal codification system in Indonesia.

Full Text:



Bagir Manan, 1992. Dasar-Dasar Perundang-Undangan Indonesia, Jakarta: Ind-Hill-Co, 1992.

Busroh, F. F., 2017. Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Regulasi

Pertanahan. Arena Hukum, 10(2), 227-250.

Fitryantica, A., 2019. Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia melalui Konsep

Omnibus Law. Gema Keadilan, 6(3), 300-316.Haryono, H. (2019). Eksistensi Aliran Positivisme Dalam

Ilmu Hukum. Meta-Yuridis, 2(1), 96-107

Hamidi, J., Sugiharto, M. A., & Ihsan, M., 2013. Membedah Teori-Teori Hukum Kontemporer.

Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P., 2008. Hukum Responsif. Cetakan II. Nusa Media. Bandung.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2012. Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta:

Sinar Grafika.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. 2019. Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Sistem Kodifikasi dan Omnibus Law serta

Kombinasi Keduanya. Jakarta: Makalah Ceramah Hukum.

Lumbantoruan, H. D., 2017. Pembentukan Regulasi Badan Usaha Dengan Model Omnibus Law. Jurnal

Hukum to-ra, 3(1), 463-472

Mahfud MD., 2009. Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, 2002. Konsep-Konsep Pembangunan Hukum dalam Pembangunan, Bandung:


Nurhardianto, F., 2015. Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong

Aspirasi Politik Islam, 11(1), 33-44.

Siallagan, H., 2016. Penerapan Prinsip Negara Hukum di Indonesia. Sosiohumaniora, 18(2), 122-128.

CNBC Indonesia, 137233/hari-ini-draftomnibus-law-cilaka-diserahkan-ke-dpr

CNN Indonesia, 467714/4-ruuomnibus-law-dikebut-dpr omnibus-law-biladiterapkan-di-indonesia/


  • There are currently no refbacks.