RELEVANCE OF THE VALUE OF JUSTICE IN LEGAL PROTECTION FOR PROVIDER OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN CASE OF CRIMINAL ACTION RELATED TO CORRUPTION PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES

Maryanto Maryanto

Abstract


The pace of infrastructure development in Indonesia is increasing rapidly, this is a form of the government's commitment to improving people's welfare. The pace of infrastructure development in reality often has problems, including failure to build. The absence of criminal provisions in Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Procurement of Government Goods and Services has resulted in the blurring of the boundaries of the criminal and civil realms as well as administrative law in setting sanctions for providers of goods and services deemed negligent. This is often seen in cases of corruption in the procurement of goods and services, which often attracts service providers to become one of the perpetrators of criminal acts. This situation is clearly wrong, because not all acts of service and goods providers can be said to be related to the occurrence of corruption in the procurement of goods and services. This study aims to further analyze the legal protection for service and goods providers in cases of corruption in the procurement of goods and services. The method in this writing is normative. Based on the existing studies, it can be seen that the implementation of criminal sanctions for corruption in the procurement of goods for infrastructure development has not been based on the legal politics of procurement of goods, so that the criminal sanctions are still unclear, because the issue of procurement of goods should not be directly subject to criminal sanctions as an ultimum remidium, considering the procurement of goods regulated by administrative law not criminal law, while criminal threats are only as a last resort when violations in the realm of procurement of goods in infrastructure development are not controlled.


References


Books

Barda Nawari Arief, 1984, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

, 1998, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung

, 2013, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Esmi Warassih, 2011, Pranata Hukum, Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Hans Kelsen, 1935, General Theory of Law and State, Russel & Russel,New York

Hans Nawiasky, 1948, Allgemeine Rechtslehre als System der rechtlichen Grundbegriffe, Cetakan 2, Einseideln / Zurich / Koln, Benziger

L. M. Friedman, 1975, Legal System, Russel Sage Foundation, USA

Maria Farida Indrati S., 2007, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan, Buku 1, Kanisius,Yogyakarta

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2004, Ilmu Hukum; Pencarian, Pembebasan dan Pencerahan, Surakarta: Muhammadiyah Press University

Rosjidi Ranggawidjaja, 1998, Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Indonesia, Mandar Maju, Bandung

Sarja, 2016, Negara Hukum Teori Dan Praktek, Thafamedia, Yogyakarta

Soerjono Soekanto, 2007, Kelemahan-Kelemahan yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Sogar Simamora, 2013, Hukum Kontrak, Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia, Wins & Partners Law Firm dan LbJ, Surabaya

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, 2013, Prinsip-Prinsip Individualisasi Pidana Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Indonesia, UNDIP, Semarang

Journal

Anis Mashdurohatun, Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Illegal Logging Bagi Kelestarian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Upaya Penanggulangannya, Jurnal Hukum, Vol XXVI, No. 2, Agustus 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v26i2

Bobi Aswandi dan Kholis Roisah, Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Volume 1, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145

Galuh Ais Zakiyah dan Arpangi, Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Demak Nomor 64/Pdt.G/2018/PN Dmk Dalam Sengketa Lelang Pembangunan Gedung Sanggar Pramuka Di Kabupaten Demak, Prosiding KONFERENSI ILMIAH MAHASISWA UNISSULA (KIMU) 4 Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, 28 Oktober 2020. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/kimuh/article/download/12338/4805

I Gusti Ketut Ariawan, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jurnal Hukum Kertha Widya, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013. (Tanpa DOI)

Rizki Bagus Prasetio, Pandemi Covid-19: Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Darurat Dan Perlindungan HAM, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.327-346

Vita Mahardhika, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, Jurnal Hukum Samudera Keadilan, Vol. 16, No. 1, hlm. 148. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i1.2636.

Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945;

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001;

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004;

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018.

Internet

https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen. Diakses pada 12 Desember 2020

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/113690-ID-pemberantasan-korupsi-dalam-pengadaan-ba.pdf, diakses pada 12 Desember 2020

nasional.kontan.co.id, Diakses pada 12 Desember 2020




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/pdih.v4i4.20811

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.