REPOSITION OF THE VALUE OF JUSTICE IN LEGAL PROTECTION OF DEBTORS IN BANKRUPTCY LAW POLITICS

Abdul Khair

Abstract


In its development, the business world requires the provision of capital lending services. However, the development of the need for capital in the business world has not been matched by protection for debtors. With Articles 55 and 56 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, the position of debtor protection in the implementation of bankruptcy by separatist creditors is weak, this is due to the absence of legal remedies that can be taken by the debtor during bankruptcy. has been declared applies to him. Therefore, the issues that will be discussed in this journal are the legal protection system for debtors in bankruptcy law politics, the weaknesses of the legal protection system for debtors in bankruptcy law politics, and problems related to finding solutions through reforming the legal protection system for debtors in bankruptcy law politics. . The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal protection system for debtors in the politics of bankruptcy law; to analyze the weaknesses of the legal protection system for debtors in the politics of bankruptcy law; to find solutions through reforming the legal protection system for debtors in bankruptcy law politics. The approach method used in this paper is a normative juridical approach. From the research that has been done, it can be concluded that the existence of Article 55 and Article 56 of Law Number 37 Year 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations has resulted in injustice to the debtor in the implementation of bankruptcy against the debtor committed by the creditor; So it is necessary to carry out reforms in the implementation of debtor protection in the implementation of bankruptcy against debtors by implementing the debtor protection system in the implementation of bankruptcy against debtors based on Pancasila.



References


BOOKS

Iur. R. Soejartin, 2000, Hukum Dagang I dan II, Penerbit Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta

Riduan Tobink dan Bill Nikholaus, 2003, “Kamus Istilah Perbankan”, Atalya Rileni Sudeco, Jakarta

Gamer,A. 1990. Black’s Law Dictionary. Seventh Edition. Minn : West Group

Hartono, Sunaryati, 1988, Hukum Ekonomi Pembangunan Indonesia. Cetakan Kedua Badan

Hasan, Alwi, 2007, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Keempat. Jakarta : PT. Balai Pustaka

J.Satrio, 2001, Hukum, Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Bandung : Cira Aditya Bakti

Jarot Jati Bagus Suseno, Reposisi Nilai Pancasila Dalam Politik Hukum Dagang Di Era Globalisasi, Artikel disampaikan pada acara FGD Dharma Dyaksa pada 12 Juni 2013

Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman. Jakarta : Bina Cipta

Law

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang Nomer 4 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kepailitan

Undang-Undang Nomer 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsume

Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Journal/Internet

Anggar Septiadi, Sepenjang 2018, Jumlah Kasus Kepailitan Melonjak, Diakses melalui kontan.co.id, Pada 12 Mei 2019

https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/320/node/19/undangundang-nomor-4-tahun-1998/, diakses pada 4 Juli 2019.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Anis Mashdurohatun, Abd Syakur, Protection against Witnesses in Criminal Justice Proceedings in Indonesia Based on the Humanitarian Value, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net. Volume 13, Issue 7, 2020.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, The Implementation of Punishment Theories in the Verdict of Narcotics Case by Judge in Indonesia, TEST Enginering and Management, ISSN 0193-4120 , Mach-April 2020, P 2797.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/pdih.v4i4.20768

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.