The Judge's Consideration on The Case of Rejection of The Lawsuit Related to Land Grabbing (Study of Decision No. 189/PDT. G/2020/PN PLK)

Meishy Febrizha, Mulida Hayati, Yacob F Martono

Abstract


Land disputes in Indonesia are still a complex and recurring legal issue, especially in cases of land grabbing that involve the act of controlling or using another party's land without legitimate rights. This problem often leads to judicial proceedings because it is related to property rights protected by the Basic Agrarian Law. However, many lawsuits were rejected because the plaintiff could not prove land ownership or did not meet the formal or material requirements as stipulated by the civil procedure law. This study aims to analyze the judge's consideration in rejecting the land grabbing lawsuit in Decision No. 189/PDT. G/2020/PN PLK and identify the legal variables that affect the decision. The method used is qualitative research with a normative juridical approach through literature study. The results of the study showed that the judge rejected the lawsuit by referring to Article 1365 of the Civil Code regarding unlawful acts and Article 1865 of the Civil Code regarding the principle of the burden of proof. The plaintiff was considered incapable of fulfilling the elements of unlawful acts and failed to present authentic evidence, such as land deeds and certificates, as the basis for ownership rights in accordance with the UUPA.


Keywords


Judge's Consideration; Soil Erosion; Verdict.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Andri, B. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Ganti Rugi Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Sengketa Atas Tanah. Rechtsnormen Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum, 3(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.56211/rechtsnormen.v3i1.606

Andryawan, Sada, K. F. N., Natanael, Syofian, D. A., Baeha, D. L. I., & Tingginehe, N. E. (2024). Analisis Putusan Nomor 93/Pdt.G/2023/Pn Btl Mengenai Sengketa Tanah Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. 4(3), 381–390.

Apdoni, T., Simbala, Y., & Umbas, R. R. (2025). Kajian hukum terhadap penyerobotan tanah menurut hukum pidana. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT : Lex Privatum, 16(1), 1–18.

Atihuta, K., Tjoanda, M., & Radjawane, P. (2023). Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(4), 329. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793

Az-zahra, A. M. (2025). Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Sertifikat Tanah Di Desa Sumbersari Tebo Jambi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tebo Nomor 100/Pid.B/2024/PN.Mrt). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28459981/%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100208%0Ahttp://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://ww

B, E., & Guntur, M. (2025). Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Sengketa Balik Nama Hak Atas Tanah yang Penjualnya Tidak Diketahui Keberadaannya (Afwezigheid) (Studi Putusan Nomor : 3/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Kla).

Gayatrie, R. R. (2023). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sertifikat Hak Milik pada Pengadilan TUN Pontianak dan Pengadilan Tinggi TUN Jakarta. CONSTITUO : Journal of State and Political Law Research, 2(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.47498/constituo.v2i1.1664

Hakim, R., Prasetyo, B. R., Rochman, M. H., & Indarsita, V. (2023). Juridical Analysis of Unlawful Acts in a Land Grabbing Case Without Ownership Rights. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 1(02), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i02.157

Heydemans, F. S., Setlight, D. M. M. M., Roeroe, S. D. L., & Pn.Amr. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pengrusakan Tanah Milik Orang Lain Dalam Perspektif Putusan Pn Amurang No. 164/Pdt.G/2022. 3.

Husna, N., Jumadiah, & Aksa, F. N. (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menolak Perkara Gugatan Penggugat Penyandang Dana. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 7(3).

Laturette, A. I. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat pada Kawasan Hutan. Sasi, 27(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.504

Mappasessu. (2023). Penerapan Teori Pembuktian dalam Sengketa Milik Tanah Agar Putusan Makin Efektif. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 18891–18901.

Mongi, G. Y., Tampongangoy, G. H., & Tinangon, E. N. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Permasalahan Sengketa Penyerobotan Tanah Milik Orang Lain. 80(16), 1–7.

Pengadilan Negeri Palangka Raya. (2020). Putusan No. 189/Pdt.G/2020/PN Plk.

Rahman, I., Mayasari, R. E., Haerani, Y., & Sari, P. (2022). Analisis Hukum Perdata terhadap Kasus Penyerobotan Tanah. Jurnal Tana Mana, 3(1), 78–85. https://ojs.staialfurqan.ac.id/jtm/

Rahmawati, D. (2023). Permasalahan Feodalisme Tanah Di Indonesia. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 3(03), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v3i03.688

Regulation:

Burgerlijk Wetboek, “KUHP: Civil Code,” 2007.

Government of the Republic of Indonesia, “Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1960 Concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations,” Law No. 5 of 1960, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2004.

P. N. P. Raya, “Decision Number 189/Pdt.G/2020/PN PLK.”




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.7.3.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Law Development Journal has been indexed in: