Juridical Analysis of the Application of the Presumption of Innocence in Criminal Investigation

Paulus Kostan Simonda, Moh. Muhibbin

Abstract


This study aims to determine the application of the presumption of innocence in the examination of criminal offenses. The type of research used is descriptive normative, with a statute approach, historical approach, conceptual, case and specific research. The results of this study indicate that the recognition of the presumption of innocence in the criminal procedure law applicable in our country contains two purposes. First, the provision aims to provide protection and guarantees to a human being who has been accused of committing a criminal offense in the process of examining a case so that his human rights are still respected. Secondly, these provisions provide guidance to officers to limit their actions in conducting examinations of suspects/defendants because they are human beings who still have the same dignity as those conducting the examination. One of the obstacles in the investigation process is that there are investigators who have not acted professionally in conducting investigations, resulting in actions that are contrary to the presumption of innocence.


Keywords


Criminal; Examination; Innocence; Investigation; Presumption.

Full Text:

PDF

References


D Limbong, ‘Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penerapan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dalam Proses Penyidikkan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan’, Focus Upmi, 6.3 (2017), 119–26 .

Debora Maria Paramita Pasaribu, Sukirno & Sri Sudaryatmi, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 6.02 (2015), 3

E. Nurhaini Butarbutar, ‘Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah: Penerapan Dan Pengaturannya Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11.3 (2011), 470–79 .

Erman Rajagukguk, Perlu Pembaharuan Hukum dan Profesi Hukum, Pidato Pengukuhan Sebagai Guru Besar Hukum, Suara Pembaharuan.

Feby Sri Yelvita, ‘Implementasi Hak-Hak Tersangka Sebagai Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah’, 8.5.2017, 2022, 2003–5.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2006. Memahami Hukum Kepolisian. PT Rajagrafindo Persada: Jakarta.

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, Article 8.

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ledi A. Saroinsong, Nontje Rimbing, and Christine S. Tooy, ‘Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah (Presumption of Innocence) Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia’, Lex Administratum, 11.1 (2023).

Regulation of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.01.PW.07.03 of 1982 concerning Guidelines for Implementing the Criminal Procedure Code.

S.H. Rangga Sasmita, ‘Penerapan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Tindak Pidana Pencurian’, Law Reform, 7.1 (2011), 50–75 .

Sudikno Mertodikusumo, 2007, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta,

Sukirno &Sri Sudaryatmi Debora Maria Paramita Pasaribu, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 6.02 (2015), 3.

Tahir, Heri. 2011. Proses Hukum yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.

Tahir, Heri. 2011. Proses Hukum yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo

Tahir, Heri. 2011. Proses Hukum yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.

Wijana, Ekaristi. Viral Pemuda Tiba-Tiba Didor Polisi Di Warung Dikabarkan Tewas di Tempat tersedia pda situs https://jogja.suara.com/read/2020/06/25/191 509/viral-pemuda-tiba-tiba- didor-polisi-diwarung-dikabarkan-tewas-di-tempat accessed on 27 October 2020.

Yelvita, Feby Sri, ‘Implementasi Hak-Hak Tersangka Sebagai Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah’, 8.5.2017, 2022, 2003–5




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.5.4.631-642

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Law Development Journal has been indexed in: