THE JUDICIAL POWER LIMITATION OF COMMERCIAL COURTS COMPETENCY IN COMMERCIAL DISPUTES

Sobandi Sobandi

Abstract


One of the important instruments in a state of law is the existence of an independent judiciary, whether it is based on the doctrine of separation of powers, the notion of a state based on law or democracy. An independent judicial power is not absolute in the sense that it is free to lead to arbitrariness so that there must be restrictions on that power and freedom. The approach method is used a normative juridical approach. The results of the study found that the limitations of judicial power were based on the constitutional basis, namely Article 1 paragraph 3 of the 1945 Constitution, Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution and Article 24 A of the 1945 Constitution. From the concept of separation or division of powers, compose an independent judicial power which is exercised by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it and a Constitutional Court. The commercial court as a sub-system within the judicial power is a special court under the general judiciary that has different competencies from other general courts. The implementation of the limitation of judicial power in the competence of the commercial court to realize an independent judicial power is normatively spread out in various laws.


Keywords


Commercial; Court; Judicial; Power; Limitation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Journals

Bagir Manan, Prasyarat Kemerdekaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum Year XXX No.348 November 2014;

Dachran Busthami, Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum di Indonesia, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 46 No. 4, October 2017;

Faridy, Menuju Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Bebas dan Mandiri, HAKAM, Vol 02 No 02, December 2018;

Firman Floranta Adonara, Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol 12, No. 2 June 2015;

Hilario G.Davide, Jr.,Comments on the Paper of Hon. Andrew Kwok Nang Li, Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hongkong Special Administrative Region of the People S Republic of China, Conference of Chief Justices of Asia and Pacific, 18th Law Asia Conference, Seoul, 8 September 1999;

Kosariza, Netty, Meri Yarni, Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, Vol 4 No 2 December 2020;

Rahayu Prasetyaningsih, Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.8, No 5, October 2011;

B. Books

Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi, 2013, Pengawasan dan Pembinaan Pengadilan Fungsi Manajemen Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Pengadilan di Bawahnya Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945, Setara Press, Malang;

Antonius Sudirman, 2007, Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya Suatu Pendekatan Dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurisprudence) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

Budiono Kusumohamidjojo, 2016, Teori Hukum Dilema antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan, Yrama Widya, Bandung;

Dahlan Sinaga, 2015, Kemandirian dan Kebebasan Hakim Memutus Perkara Pidana dalam Negara Hukum Pancasila Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Nusa Media, Bandung;

Donald Black, 1976, The Behaviour of Law, Academic Press, New York USA;

Gregory Leyh, 2008, Hermeneutika Hukum, Nusa Media, Bandung;

Herlien Budiono, 2006, Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia: Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

I Dewa Gede Palguna, 2013, Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitusional Complaint) Upaya Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Jimly Asshidiqie, 2006, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta;

Jogi Nainggolan, 2015, Energi Hukum sebagai Faktor Pendorong Efektivitas Hukum, Refika Aditama, Bandung;

K. Wantjik Saleh, 1977, Kehakiman dan Peradilan, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta;

Kaelan, 2009, Filsafat Pancasila Pandangan Hidup Bangsa Indonesia, Paradigma, Yogyakarta;

Lawrence Friedman, 1984, American Law, An Introduction, W.W. Norton & Company, New York;

M. Yahya Harahap, 2008, Kekuasaan Mahkamah Agung Pemeriksaan Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, 2010, Panduan Pemasyarakatan Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (Sesuai dengan urutan Bab, Pasal dan ayat), Sekretaris Jendral MPR RI, Jakarta;

Moh.Mahfud MD., 2011, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;

Piatur Pangaribuan dan Arie Purnomosidi, 2014, Negara Hukum Pancasila dalam Kerangka NKRI, Cakrawala Media, Surakarta;

Ridwan, 2012, Reorientasi Penggunaan Diskresi: Kajian tentang Kontrol Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Melalui Pejanjian Kebijakan (Beleidsovereenkomst), Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang;

Rimdam, 2012, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta;

Rusli Muhammad, 2013, Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia Beserta Putusan Kontroversial, UII Press, Yogyakarta;

Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto, 2002, Hukum Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, ELSAM-HUMA, Jakarta;

Zaenal Ma’arif, 2015, Politik dan Peradilan Sikap dan Tanggapan Kekuasaan Eksekutif terhadap Putusan Pengadilan di Bidang Politik, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i2.17706

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :

DOAJgoogle_scholarsintacrossrefMendeley onesearch  dimension

International Journal of Law Recnstruction  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, E-ISSN 2775-8885 (Online)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112IJLR is licensed under a