THE REALIZE EQUITABLE TEACHER PROTECTION THROUGH A NON-PENAL POLICY
Abstract
Teacher protection has been regulated in various laws and regulations, both laws, government regulations to ministerial regulations, but the reality of teachers is still faced with problems, including the weak legal protection. Facts are revealed when problems are encountered, such as teachers experiencing criminalization with allegations of committing violence in the learning process, teachers must face the legal process themselves, and there is no mechanism for handling them. In order to realize equitable teacher protection, this study uncovers the problem of how to develop a model to realize equitable teacher protection through a non-penal policy approach. This research was used the transdisciplinary approach involving several stakeholders through the sociological juridical research method, the results of research on the importance of being regulated by regional policies were obtained through the establishment of the Legal Service and Teacher Protection Unit (UPHPG) which is a coordinating institution to solve the problem of criminalizing teachers by prioritizing non-penal policies. The non-penal policy in handling the problem of teacher criminalization through UPHPG is formulated an integral and comprehensive handling mechanism involving several stakeholders and prioritizing prevention efforts through communication, information and education to all parties, providing consultation and legal assistance as well as legal assistance services to good teachers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AS, Yenny. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Guru Yang Berkeadilan Di Kota Pontianak.†Urnal Hukum Media Bhakti 3, no. December 2019 (2019): 153–64. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i2.105.
AS, Yenny, Nurfitriawati Nurfitriawati, Klara Dawi, and Sri Ayu Septinawati. “Legal Protection for Human Trafficking Victim, Especially Women and Children in West Kalimantan.†International Journal of Multi Discipline Science (IJ-MDS) 1, no. 1 (2018): 42. https://doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v1i1.419.
Borko, H., J. Jacobs, and K. Koellner. “Contemporary Approaches to Teacher Professional Development.†International Encyclopedia of Education, no. November 2017 (2010): 548–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0.
Darling-hammond, Linda, Maria E Hyler, and Madelyn Gardner. “E Ff Ective Teacher Professional Development,†no. June (2017).
Dede, Chris, Diane Jass Ketelhut, Pamela Whitehouse, Lisa Breit, and Erin M. McCloskey. “A Research Agenda for Online Teacher Professional Development.†Journal of Teacher Education 60, no. 1 (2009): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554.
Dwisvimiar, Inge. “Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum.†Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 3 (2011): 522–31. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179.
Fauzi, Imron. “Dinamika Kekerasan Antara Guru Dan Siswa Studi Fenomenologi Tentang Resistensi Antara Perlindungan Guru Dan Perlindungan ANak.†Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53, no. 9 (2019): 1689–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan. “Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Filosofis Dan Ideologis Bangsa.†DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 25 (2017): 1. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v13i25.1545.
Hall, William J., and Hayden C. Dawes. “Is Fidelity of Implementation of an Anti-Bullying Policy Related to Student Bullying and Teacher Protection of Students?†Education Sciences 9, no. 2 (2019): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020112.
Hayat, Hayat. “Keadilan Sebagai Prinsip Negara Hukum: Tinjauan Teoritis Dalam Konsep Demokrasi.†PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 2, no. 2 (2015): 388–408. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n2.a10.
Korupsi, Penanggulangan. “Kebijakan Non Penal ( Penanggulangan Korupsi ) Berdimensi Transendental,†2016, 384–91.
Koski, William. “Teacher Collective Bargaining, Teacher Quality, and the Teacher Quality Gap: Toward a Policy Analytic Framework.†Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev. 6, no. 2000 (2012): 67.
Mudlofir, Ali. “Perlidungan Profesi Guru Di Persimpangan Jalan,†no. 26 (2011): 20–41.
Muis, Tamsil. “Tindakan Kekerasan Guru Terhadap Siswa Dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar (Studi Kasus Di SMAN Surabaya).†Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik) 2, no. 1 (2017): 86. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v2n1.p86-90.
Munawir, AHmad. “Paradigma Guru Dan Orangtua Terhadap Penerapan Undang-Undang Perlindungan ANak Di Sekolah.†: : Journal of Islamic Economic Law 4, no. 2 (2019): 110–23.
Priyatno, Dwidja. “Kriminalisasi Kebijakan.†Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 23, no. 2 (2010): 146–54.
Rina Melati Sitompul, M.Hamdan, Edy Ikhsan, Mahmud Mulyadi. “Kebijakan Non Penal Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Kasus Provinsi Sumatera Utara).†USU Law Journal 2, no. 3 (2014): 190–204.
Rozi, Syaikhu. “Strategi Pencegahan Dan Pengendalian Konflik Antara Orangtua Dan Guru Di Madrasah,†n.d., 1–18.
Saihu, TAufik. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru.†Al Amin: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Budaya Islam 5, no. 1 (2019): 49–58.
Serah, Yenny Aman, and Rini Setiawati. “Non-Penal Policy Against Teacher Criminalization.†Journal of Critical Revieuw 7, no. 14 (2020): 656–60. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.14.115.
Tanjung, Fahriza Marta, and Restu Darwin. “Implementation of Private Teacher Protection Policies†384, no. Aisteel (2020): 416–20. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.91.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v6i2.17566
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :
International Journal of Law Recnstruction | ||
Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction | |
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | E-ISSN 2580-9245 (Online) | |
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 | IJLR is licensed under a |