Analisis Gap & Pencapaian Indikator Smart City Readiness Dalam Program Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Wakatobi

Wa Ode Siti Jurianti Aswad

Abstract


ABSTRACT

Smart city-based development is becoming a trend in the world amid the complexity of urban problems and technological developments. Continuation of the Movement Towards 100 Smart Cities program in Indonesia, in 2021 the government is targeting 50 Super Priority Tourism Areas for technical guidance on the Smart City Masterplan.  One of the selected areas is Wakatobi Regency, which has problems with limited infrastructure and budget. This study aims to determine the gap in the regional performance of Wakatobi Regency related to smart city readiness indicators. Smart city is a complex, gradual and multi-sectoral business, so long-term planning is needed. This study uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive method that aims to describe the situation objectively. The results show that the achievement of smart city readiness indicators in the Wakatobi Regency development program is low or there is a gap between existing and target conditions in the smart city dimension.

Kata Kunci : Smart City, Teknologi, Kesenjangan, Kinerja Daerah

 

ABSTRAK

Pembangunan berbasis smart city telah menjadi trend di dunia ditengah kompleksitas permasalah perkotaan dan laju perkembangan teknologi. Sebagai lanjutan dari program Gerakan Menuju 100 Smart City di Indonesia, Tahun 2021 pemerintah menyasar 50 daerah yang termasuk dalam Kawasan Pariwisata Super Prioritas untuk bimbingan teknis Masterplan Smart City. Salah satu daerah yang terpilih adalah Kabupaten Wakatobi yang disisi lain masih menghadapi masalah keterbatasan infrastrukur dan anggaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesenjangan capaian kinerja daerah Kabupaten Wakatobi yang terkait dengan indikator kesiapan smart city (smart city readiness). Pembangunan smart city merupakan usaha yang kompleks, bertahap dan bersifat multi sektoral sehingga diperlukan perencanaan jangka panjang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif yang bertujuan untuk menggambarkan keadaan secara objektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan pencapaian indikator smart city readiness dalam program pembangunan daerah di Kabupaten Wakatobi masih rendah atau masih ada gap antara kondisi eksisiting dan target dalam dimensi smart city.

Kata Kunci : Smart City, Teknologi, Kesenjangan, Kinerja Daerah


Full Text:

PDF

References


Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Axelsson, K., & Granath, M. (2018). Stakeholders’ stake and relation to smartness in smart city development: Insights from a Swedish city planning project. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.001

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126

Joshi, S., Saxena, S., Godbole, T., & Shreya. (2016). Developing Smart Cities: An Integrated Framework. Procedia Computer Science, 93, 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.258

Lara, A. P., da Costa, E. M., Furlani, T. Z., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2016). Smartness that matters: Towards a comprehensive and human-centred characterisation of smart cities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0034-z

Nguyen, H. T., Marques, P., & Benneworth, P. (2022). Living labs: Challenging and changing the smart city power relations? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121866

Praharaj, S., & Han, H. (2019). Cutting through the clutter of smart city definitions: A reading into the smart city perceptions in India. City, Culture and Society, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.05.005

Richter, M. A., Hagenmaier, M., Bandte, O., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2022). Smart cities, urban mobility and autonomous vehicles: How different cities needs different sustainable investment strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121857

Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. In Sustainable Cities and Society (Vol. 38, pp. 697–713). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.

Sutriadi, R. (2017). 10 Langkah Mencerdaskan Kota. ITB Press.

Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E., & Ioppolo, G. (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. In Sustainable Cities and Society (Vol. 45, pp. 348–365). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jkr.v2i2.26916

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.