ANIMA AND ANIMUS PORTRAYED BY R AND JULIE IN WARM BODIES FILM

Dewi Sri Anisah, Idha Nurhamidah

Abstract


This study analyzes anima and animus portrayed by R and Julie in Warm Bodies film. The aims of this study is to analyze the charateristics of Anima and Animus portrayed by the main characters in Warm Bodies film. This study uses Carl Jung’s Analytical Psychology theory.

 

The method used in this study was descriptive qualitative. Warm Bodies film was the primary data was taken in the form of the monologues and the dialogues in the film. The secondary data were taken from the e-books, e-journals, essays, articles, and website. Morever, watching the film, reading the scripts of the film, identifying the data, classifying the data, and reducing the data were the processes of the data collecting method. The last was data analyzing supported by the attachment of appendices and related theory descriptively.

 

This study concludes two points. First, there are the characteristics of anima described by R. He has the characteristic of feminine are symphatetic, moody, vain, naive and emphatic. Second, there are the characteristics of animus described by Julie. She has the characteristic of masculine are aggressive, defends own self, brave and strong. The main characters show how the characteristics of anima and animus described by them in Warm Bodies film. Thus, they were a romantic couple as humans with the characteristics of feminine and masculine of both. Although, these two characters have anima and animus, R is still dominant in their relationship.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arasa, Golden. “Personality and Individual Difference: Literature in Psychology.†Procedia - Social and Behaviora Sciences (2015): 2.

Santos, Rosemary Conceicao Dos. “Psychology of Literature and Literature in Psychology.†SciELO Analytics (2018): 3.

Zhu, Jiang dan Lemeng Han. “Analysis on the Personality of Maggie by Jung's Archetype Theory.†ACADEMY PUBLISHER (2013): 1.

Antonas, Vassilis. Coaching for Impact: The Evolution of Leadership. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Azad, Azadeh. Taming My Animus: A Poemgraphy. 2017.

Bem, Sandra L. “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny.†Journal of Consuling and Clinical Psychology 42 (1974) (10 February 2017): 155-162. Web.

Bolanos, Henry. Spritual Beliefs System: Definition and Practice. ICS, Inc, 2018.

Colman, Andrew M. Oxford Dictionary of Psychology. Winner of the American Library Association 'Outsanding Reference Source' Award, 2015.

Crellin, Clare. Jung's Theory of Personality: A Modern Reappraisal. New York: Routledge, 2014.

Doughty, Ruth dan Christine Etherington Wright. Undersanding Film Theory. London: Palgrave, 2017.

Feist, Jess dan Gregory J Feist. “Theories of Personality.†United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008. 103-104.

Fischer, Constance T. Qualitative Research Methods for Psychologists: Introduction Through Empirical Studies. United Kingdom: Elsevier Inc, 2011.

Harding, M. Esther. The Way of All Women. New York: Shambala Publications, Inc, 2017.

Hudson, Joyce Rockwood. Natural Sprituality: A Hand Book for Jungian Inner Work in Spritual Community. United States of America: Chiron Publication, 2016.

Jung, Carl Gustav. Four Archetypes. the United Kingdom: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 2014.

Lawson, Thomas T. Carl Jung, Darwin of the Mind. USA: Routledge, 2018.

Lemma, Girma. “General Psychology.†(2005): 4. Defense University College.

McLeod, Saul. “ What is Psychology?†Simply Psychology (2019): 1. https://simplypschology.org/whatispsychology.html.

Rowland, Susan. C.G. Jung in the Humanities: Taking the Soul's Path. Routledge, 2013.

Sarieddin, Maysar. “Women, Violence, and Jung's Archetype.†Studies In Asian Social Science (2018): 1-7.

Sharf, Richard S. Theories of Psychotherapy & Counseling:Concept and Cases, 5th Edition. United States of America: Linda Schreiber-Ganster, 2011.

Stevens, Anthony. Archetypes Revisited and Updated Natural History of the Self. London: Routledge, 2004.

Zimmerman dan Shadow David. “Animating a Jungian Concept For Devisers. Derictors, and Actors.†The Anima in Theatre (2016): 17.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.