ANALYSIS OF HAJJ REGISTRATION RESTRICTIONS POLICY (STUDY AT THE MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS OFFICE, SALATIGA CITY)

Mustadzkiroh Mustadzkiroh, Akhmad Khisni

Abstract


PMA No. 29 of 2015 on the holding of regular pilgrimage contains the minimum age requirement to register the 12-year hajj and permit to register the hajj again after 10 years from the last hajj. PMA is in response to the long queue of pilgrims, but also known as the policy of hajj restrictions , In the perspective of Law Number 13 Year 2008 normatively PMA No. 29 of 2015 is inconsistent with Law Number 13 of 2008, it can even be said to limit the right of individuals to perform worship according to their beliefs. Implementation This policy also brings positive and negative implications in society, the positive side of raising public awareness about the importance of pilgrimage and giving a sense of justice for the community to perform the pilgrimage and primarily educate the community to divert its economic potential not just hajj many times but more on quality improvement Social worship. Negative side of this provision, can be understood as a policy that castrate the right of people to carry out worship in accordance with their beliefs and cause perception in the community about the difficulty of performing the pilgrimage. The role of the Government, MUI, public figures and the Muslim community in general becomes important for the realization of the justice of society to obtain equal rights in performing the pilgrimage.

Keywords: Restrictions on Hajj Registration, Individual Right of Worship, Community Justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. New York Times Magazine, 32–33, 122, 124, 126.

Gillan & Martin. (2002). Financial engineering, corporate governance, and the collapse of Enron. WP 2002-001, Center for Corporate Governance, University of Delaware.

Gillies, J. (1992). Boardroom renaissance. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson and the National Centre for Management Research and Development.

Gordon, J. N. (2003). What Enron means for the management and control of the modern corporation: Some initial reflections. University of Chicago Law Review, 69(3), 1233–1251.

Hall & Murphy. (2002). Stock options for undiversified executives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 42.

Hansen, P. (1993, August). The duty of care, the business judgment rules, and the American Law Institute Corporate Governance Project. Business Lawyer, 48, 1355–1359.

Hawley, J. P., & Williams, A. T. (2001). The rise of fiduciary capitalism in the United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Heidrick & Struggles. (2006). The board of directors’ role in CEO succession, Q & A with Heidrick & Struggles. In Building high-performance boards. Chicago: Author.

Hinsey, J. (2006) Corporate governance activists are headed in the wrong direction. Working Knowledge, Harvard Business School.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v18i4.1860

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

google_scholar doajr onesearch garuda crosref sinta dimension scopus  scopus scopus  taylor taylor
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
   
Faculty of LawUnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,

ISSN ( 1907-3319 )

e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 )

Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112