ACTION AGAINST NEW DRUG TYPE GORILLA TOBACCO AT WONOSOBO POLICE REGENCY
Abstract
This research aims to determine the implementation of the enforcing process againts the new drug types of tobacco gorilla in Wonosobo Police Resort based on the Criminal Code (KUHAP). This research is a descriptive empirical law research, by doing research on the implementation of the action on the new drug tobacco gorilla in Police Resort Wonosobo. The type of data used is primary data and secondary data. Secondary data sources include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques used are literature studies, in the form of books, and documents and field studies. Data analysis technique use interactive model of analisys, that is process analyze by using three component, that is data collecting, data reduction, and conclusion. Based on the discussion resulted the conclusion, first is the implementation of the action against the new drug type of tobacco gorilla in Wonosobo Police Resort has been done properly according to the law in Indonesia. Secondly, obstacles experienced in the process of action against new types of drugs gorilla tobacco in Wonosobo Police Resort
Keywords: Action, Gorilla TobaccoFull Text:
PDFReferences
Bird, A., Buchanan, R., & Rogers, P. (2004). The seven habits of an effective board. European Business Journal, 16(3), 128–132.
Bradley, M., Schipani, C. A., Sundaram, A. K., & Walsh, J. P. (1999). The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at a crossroads. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(3), 9–86.
Brancato, C., & Plath, C. (2004). Corporate governance best practices: A blueprint for the post-Enron era. New York: The Conference Board.
Buffett, W. (1993). Annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders. Available from Berkshire Hathaway Corporation.
Business Roundtable. (2005). Principles of governance and American competitiveness. Washington, DC: Author.
Carey, D. C., & Patsalos-Fox, M. (2006). Shaping strategy from the boardroom. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 90–94.
Carter, C. B., & Lorsch, J. W. (2004). Back to the drawing board—Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Carver, J. (2007, November). The promise of governance theory: Beyond codes and best practices. Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1030–1037.
Charan, R. (2005). Ending the CEO succession crisis. Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 72–81.
Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2002). Understanding Enron: It’s about the gatekeepers, stupid (Columbia Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 207). Business Law, 57, 1403.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v18i4.1857
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :
 | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3319 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |