APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN HANDLING CHILD CRIMINAL CASES IN WONOSOBO DISTRICT COURT
Abstract
The objective of this particular thesis are to find out whether the application of Restorative Justice in child crime management has been applied in Wonosobo District Court, to find out the obstacles which challenge the application of Restorative Justice and to find out how to overcome those obstacles in child crime management. This particular rersearch uses empirical law method which sess the law from the factual perspective and which observes how the law functions in the society using Juridical Sociological approach. The source of data that will be used is prioritized on primary data which are the data obtained from the respondents and the interview result from the Judges of Juvenile Justice who work in Wonosobo District Court and the secondary data such as library study and analyses from several recent critical writings and articles regarding law as well as other law related to the settlement of child crime management. The findings of the result show that in fact, Restorative Justice has been applied well in Wonosobo District Court in the child crime management by through a diversion process between the victim and the suspect by the Hakim Anak. The obstacle factor of Restorative Justice is actually caused by different perception regarding the meaning of justice among the people involved in diversion either the victims, victims’ families, the suspects, the suspects’ families, the law enforcement apparatus, and the society against the diversion implementation.
Keywords: Restorative Justice, diversion, child crime.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Lindholm, C. (1997). Logical and moral dilemmas of postmodernism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3(4), 747–760.
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.
American Bar Association. (2004). Corporate director’s guidebook (4th ed.). Committee on Corporate Laws, ABA Section of Business Law. Chicago: American Bar Association.
American Law Institute. (1994). Principles of corporate governance: Analysis and recommendations. Philadelphia: Author.
Bainbridge, S. M. (1993). In defense of the shareholder wealth maximization norm: A reply to Professor Green. Washington and Lee Law Review, 50, 1423.
Barrington, L. (2000). Business, government and civil society—Working together for a better world. Asian Review of Public Administration, 12(1).
Bart, C. (2004). The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: An initial progress report. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(2/3), 111–125.
Bebchuk, L. (2007, May). The myth of the shareholder franchise. Virginia Law Review, 93(3), 675.
Berle, A. A., Jr., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Commerce Clearing House.
Bernstein, A. (December 2007–January 2008). Lipton vs. Bebchuck. Directorship, 33(6), 20–25.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v18i4.1856
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :
 | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3319 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |