The Legal Comparison of Transfer of Object Fiduciary by Debtor to Third Party without Creditor's Approval

Widhi Handoko, Bahtiyar Efendi

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to find out about the Fiduciary provider in the Consumer Financing agreement with the Fiduciary Guarantee contained in the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed, it is forbidden to transfer the Fiduciary guarantee object to another party without the approval of the Fiduciary Recipient. This is because in Act No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees there are provisions regarding the prohibition to transfer objects of Fiduciary guarantees without the approval of Fiduciary Recipients to provide legal protection to Fiduciary Recipients. The research in this paper is a normative law research. In the debtor's relationship with a third party, there is no legal relationship because the transfer of the fiduciary object is not valid as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement. Articles 35 and 36 of the UUJF also regulate criminal sanctions that reaffirm the prohibition of transferring, mortgaging, or leasing fiduciary guarantees as objects. In connection with the principle of providing legal certainty, UUJF adopts the principle of registration of fiduciary guarantees. The benefit of a fiduciary agreement made in writing is that the creditor holding the fiduciary guarantee in his interest will demand the easiest way to prove the delivery of the guarantee to the debtor.


Keywords


Fiduciary; Transfer; Debtor; Creditor;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Ade Rosadi, Bruce Anzward, Johan’s Kadir Putra, Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Pemberi Fidusia Yang Mengalihkan Atau Menyewakan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kepada Pihak Lain Tanpa Persetujuan Tertulis Dari Penerima Fidusia Di Balikpapan, Jurnal Lex Suprema Volume 2 No. I March 2020;

Diksa, I Gede Agung Pasek Pertama, Ida Bagus Putu Sutama, “Pembebanan Benda Bergerak Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Pada Lembaga Perkreditan Desa Di Desa Adat Cemagi Kabupaten Badung.†Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 6, No. 6, (2019);

Djuahenda Hasan, Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Bagi Tanah dan Benda Lain yang Melekat pada Tanah dalam Konsepsi Penerapan Asas Pemisahan Horisontal, Cetakan Ke-2, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2011;

Farah Diana, M Nur Rasyid dan Azhari Azhari, ‘Kajian Yuridis Pelaksanaan Penghapusan Jaminan FidusiaSecara Elektronik’ (2017) 1 (2) Syiah Kuala Law Journal, p. 37, 38.

H. Salim HS, 2014, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, cetakan ke-VIII, Jakarta;

Intan Shania, Sanusi, Darmawan, Akibat Hukum Debitor yang Menyewakan objek Jaminan fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan tertulis Kreditor, Diversi Jurnal Hukum, Volume 8;

Kharismawan, I Wayan; I Wayan Novy Purwanto, “Kewajiban Pemberi Fidusia Dalam Hal Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Dirampas Negaraâ€. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 7, No. 9, (2019);

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, (2009), diterjemahkan oleh R. Subekti: Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta;

M. Yasir, Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, SALAM, Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syar-I, Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016);

Muhammad Rusli Arafat, Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Debitur (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan No. 137/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Mks), HERMENEUTIKA Vol. 6, No. 1, February 2022;

Nanin Koeswidi Astuti, Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan Penerima Fidusia, Jurnal Hukum tô-râ, Vol. 3 No. 1, April 2017;

Nurkhaliza, Adena, I Made Udiana, Sutra Putrawa, “Eksekusi Barang Jaminan Sebagai Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Pada Lembaga Pembiayaan.†Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 7, No. 6, (2019);

Petra Kusuma Aji, Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia terhadap Benda yang Dijaminkan, https://pn-lembata.go.id/page/content/588/akibat-hukum-perjanjian-jaminan-fidusia-terhadap-benda-yang-dijaminkan

R.Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, 2016, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) cet.41, PT. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta;

Radhika Bagas Prabowo, Abdul Salam, Akibat Hukum Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Nama Pasangan Dalam Perkawinan Sebagai Pemberi Fidusia Oleh Pasangan Lainnya (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru No.: 853/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn Pbr), Jurnal A Salam Indonesian Notary, 2021;

Rony Chandra Siagian, Upaya Hukum Debitur Dalam Pengalihan Objek Fidusia Di Kabupaten Badung, Jurnal Kertha Negara Vol. 9 No. 10 Tahun 2021;

Suparman, Jesse Adam, and Suatra Putrawan. "Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan Yang Telah Dilegalisasi Oleh Notaris." Jurnal Kertha Semaya 4, no. 3 (2016);

Books:

Irwansyah, (2020), Penelitian Hukum “Pilihan Metode dan Praaktik Penulisan Artikelâ€. Mirra Buana Media, Yogyakarta;

J. Satrio, (2002), Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia, Cet. 1, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

Tan Kamelo, (2006), Hukum Jaminan Fidusia: Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan, Cet ke-1 Edisi Pertama, PT. Alumni, Jakarta;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i3.26672

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Akta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).