Protection Relevance of the Execution of Separatic Creditors Based on Pancasila Justice

Gregorius Yoga Panji Asmara

Abstract


The execution of the execution by separatist creditors without going through court adjudication as stipulated in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 Of 2004 is contrary to Pancasila justice. The method used is the normative juridical method. Based on the data obtained, it can be seen that the implementation of bankruptcy executions as regulated in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 of 2004 prioritizes the interests of separatist creditors, this is further complicated by the existence of a legal culture that shows that bankruptcy executions are guaranteed with mortgage without having to go through anmaning in court, the meaning of the debtor's insolvency should be a trial in court or through anmaning regarding the debtor's ability to pay off his debt, not solely based on the analysis and views of the separatist creditors. This is clearly implicitly based on Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and automatically contradicts the value of Pancasila social justice.

Keywords


Protection; Relevance Pancasila Justice; Separatic Creditors.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journal:

Adi Satrio dan R. Kartikasari, Eksekusi Harta Debitor Pailit Yang Terdapat Di Luar Indonesia Dihubungkan Dengan Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Kreditor, Ganesha Law Review, Volume 2 Issue 1, May 2020, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha;

Ana Suheri, Wujud Keadilan Dalam Masyarakat Di Tinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Nasional Jurnal Morality, Volume 4 Nomor 1 Juni 2018, Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya;

Bambang Tri Bawono, Anis Mashdurohatun, Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Illegal Logging Bagi Kelestarian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Upaya Penanggulangannya, Jurnal Hukum, Vol XXVI, No. 2, Agustus 2011;

Dedy Tri Hartono, Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepailitan, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion Edisi I, Volume 4, Tahun 2016;

Depri Liber Sonata, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Penelitian Hukum, Jurnal Fiat Justisia Ilmu Hukum, Volume 8, Nomor 1, Januari-Maret 2014;

FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, Adakah Kepalsuan Hukum Di Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia? (Suatu Penghindaran Terhadap Kepalsuan Hukum), Jurnal Selat, Vol 3 No. 2 Edisi 6 2016;

Hikmahanto Juwana, Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Politik: Intervensi Atas Keadaulatan Dalam Proses Legislasi Di Indonesia, Disampaikan dalam orasi ilmiah Dies Natalis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara Ke-50;

Imanuel Rahmani, Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Pembeli Dalam Kepailitan Pengembang (Developer) Rumah Susun, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, Volume I, Nomor 1 Agustus 2018, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945;

Luthvi Febryka Nola, Kedudukan Konsumen Dalam Kepailitan The Position Of Consumer In Bankruptcy, Jurnal Negara Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, November 2017, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat;

Maria Gabrielle Janice Angelie Siregar, Eksekusi Jaminan Dalam Kepailitan Pada Kreditor Separatis Ketika Ditangani Oleh Kurator, Jurist-Diction Law Journal, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Volume 1 No. 2, November 2018;

Muhtadi, Penerapan Teori Hans Kelsen Dalam Tertib Hukum Indonesia, Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5 No. 2 September-Desember 2012, Universitas Lampung;

Nurfaqih Irfani, Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum, Jurnal Lesgislasi Indonesia, Indonesian Journal of Legislation, Volume 17, Nomer 3, September 2020;

Rahman Frija, Etty Susilowati, dan Hendro Saptono, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Separatis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Hak Eksekutorial Dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas, Diponegoro Law Journal, Volume 5, Nomer 3, Tahun 2016, Universitas Diponegoro;

Rizal Widiya Priangga dan Yudho Taruno Muryanto, Analisis Yuridis Sita Umum Aset Badan Usaha Milik Negara Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara, Privat Law, Vol. V No. 1 Januari-Juni 2017, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta;

Sri Hartini, Setiati Widhiastuti, dan Iffah Nurhayati, Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Dalam Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman, Jurnal Civics Vol. 14 Nomor 2, 2017, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta;

Books:

Adrian Sutedi. (2009). Hukum Kepailitan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesiqa

R. Soejartin. (2007). Hukum Dagang I dan II. Jakarta: Penerbit Pradnya Paramita

Regulation:

Act No. 37 Of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v8i1.15289

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Akta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).