Sanctions of the Notary Supervisory Board of Banten Province Against Notaries Who Do Not Provide Services in Accordance with the Notary Law

Rohman Dwi Febrianto

Abstract


This Notary Code of Ethics contains various matters related to the duties and authorities of Notaries in carrying out their profession and position as public officials. The material elements contained in this Notary Code of Ethics include obligations, prohibitions, exceptions and sanctions that will be imposed on Notaries who violate this Code of Ethics.This study aims to determine and analyze:1) To find out and analyze what kind of Notary can be said not to provide services in accordance with the provisions of the Notary Law; 2) To find out and analyze the form of Sanctions imposed by the Notary Regional Supervisory Board in Banten Province; and 3) To find out and analyze the basis for consideration of the Banten Province Regional Supervisory Board in imposing sanctions. The conclusion of the research results of the Banten Province Regional Supervisory Board imposes Sanctions on Notaries who Do Not Provide Services in Accordance with the Provisions of the Notary Law, the Notary Supervisory Board can impose sanctions on violators, the sanctions imposed on members of the Indonesian Notary Association who violate the code of ethics can be: Reprimand, Warning, Schorzing (temporary dismissal) from members of the association, Onzetting (dismissal) from members of the association, and Dishonorable Dismissal from members of the association. However, the dismissal sanction given to Notaries who violate the code of ethics is not in the form of dismissal from the notary position but dismissal from membership of the Indonesian Notary Association.


Keywords


Code; Ethics; Notary; Violation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bambang Sunggono, 1997, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Betty Ivana Prasetyawati dan Paramita Prananingtyas, “Peran Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Membangun Integritas Notaris Di Era 4.0”, NOTARIUS, Nomor 1, Volume 15

H. Hadari, HM. Martini Hadari, 1992, Instrumen Penelitian Bidang Sosial, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Habib Adjie, 2011, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Habib Adjie, 2014, Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir (Tematik Terhadap UU No.30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris), PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Liliana Tedjosaputro, 1995, Etika Profesi Notaris Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Bigraf Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Munir Fuady, S.H., M.H., LL.M., 2005, Etika Profesi Hukum bagi Hakim, Jaksa, Advokat, Notaris, Kurator, dan Pengurus : Profesi Mulia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1982, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Winanto Wiryomartani, Tugas dan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris,Makalah disampaikan pada acara Kongres Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, pada tanggal 13-16 Juli 2005 di Makassar , Sulawesi Selatan.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2004, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, cetakan kedelapan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Sudarto, 2002, Metodelogi Penelitian Filsafat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.v6i1.35947

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image