Legal Protection for Winners of Land Rights Auctions That Are the Object of Dispute in Court Cases
Abstract
This study aims to analyze: 1) Legal implications for the implementation of land rights auctions that are still the object of dispute in cases in court. 2) Legal protection for winners of land rights auctions that are the object of dispute in cases in court. The approach method used in this study is a qualitative approach. This type of research is empirical research. The types and sources of data in this study are primary data obtained through interviews and secondary data obtained from literature studies. The analysis in this study is prescriptive. The results of the study concluded: 1) Legal implications for the implementation of land rights auctions that are still the object of dispute in cases in court can include several complex aspects, namely legal uncertainty of land rights, difficulty in obtaining absolute ownership, potential financial losses, obligations to resolve potential further disputes, and the influence of court decisions. Court decisions related to auction results will greatly affect the legal certainty of auction winners, because the filing of lawsuits by other parties after the auction affects the validity of the ownership rights obtained. If the court provides clear certainty regarding land ownership to the auction winner, this will strengthen its legal certainty. However, if there is still uncertainty or disputes regarding ownership, legal certainty can continue to be questioned. 2) Legal protection for the winner of the auction of land rights that are the object of dispute in a case in court, namely: If another party files a lawsuit against the auction object, then the court decides that the auction is legally valid, then in this case the auction winner's rights to the auction object already have permanent legal force and can no longer be challenged by any party. If there is a lawsuit and then the court decides that the auction is void because there is an element of an unlawful act, then the legal protection obtained by the auction winner is to be able to claim back the purchase money for the auction object that has been paid.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Begiyama Fahmi Zaki, 2016, Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pelelangan Objek Hak Tanggungan Secara Online, Fiat Justitia, Volume 10 Nomor 2.
Catur Budi Dianawati, dan Amin Purnawan, 2017, Kajian Hukum Jaminan Hak Tanggungan yang Dilelang Tanpa Proses Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Ke Ketua Pengadilan Negeri, Jurnal Akta, Volume 4, Nomor 2.
Faisal, 2018, Akibat Hukum Ketiadaan Akta Ikrar Wakaf Atas Perwakafan Tanah, DE LEGA LATA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.3 No.3.
Harisman, 2020, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Dalam Menjalankan Tugas endidikan Dan Pengajaran. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol.5 No.1.
Ilham Syahputra Prabandaru, 2018, “Pelaksanaan Lelang Barang Rampasan Berdasarkan Putusan Yang Telah berkekuatan Hukum Tetap (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Kediri)”, Journal Diversi, Volume 4, Nomor 1.
Kurnia Martini, 2016, Status Hukum Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Diperoleh Dari Lelang Berdasarkan Hak Mendahulu Negara, Fiat Justisia Journal of Law, Volume 10 Issue 3.
M. Edwin Azhari, Ali Murtadho, Djauhari, Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Nominee Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kepemilikan Tanah Oleh Warga Negara Asing Di Lombok, Jurnal Akta, Vol 5 No 1 Januari 2018.
Michael Willy, dkk., 2020, “Penyelesain Sengketa Kredit Macet Melalui Pelaksanaan PelelanganAset Debitur Oleh PT. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk Medan”. dalam DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 5 Nomor 2.
Muhammad Yusrizal, 2017, Perlindungan HukumPemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.2 No.1.
Padian Adi, 2020, Akibat Hukum Pelelangan Objek Jaminan Gadai Oleh Kreditur Tanpa Adanya Peringatan Terhadap Nasabah Oleh Perum Pegadaian, Jurnal Kajian Hukum, Vol.1 No.1.
Padian Adi. 2019, Syarat Objektifitas Dan Subjektifitas Penangguhan Penahanan, DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol.4 No.2.
Eugema Liliawati Mulyono, 2003, Tinjauan Yuridis Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pemberian Kredit Oleh Perbankan,Harvarindo, Jakarta.
Rachmadi Usman, 2016, Hukum Lelang, Sinar Grafika Offset, Jakarta.
Salim HS, 2011, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Yudha Cahya Kumala, 2020, Lelang Indonesia (serba serbi lelang dan pelaksanaannya di Indonesia), Yogyakarta, CV Budi Utama.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.v6i1.35851
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:
