Legal Protection of PPAT-Notary in Making A Deed Based on False Information of Parties

Euis Istianti

Abstract


The focus of this research has the following objectives: (1) legal certainty over the deed and the notary's responsibility for false statements of the parties; (2) legal protection for PPAT notaries who make a deed of sale and purchase based on false information from the parties. (3) an example of the waiver of rights if it turns out that there are false statements from the parties in accordance with article 51 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with the collection of literature study data, and the theory used is Hans Khelsen's Theory of Legal Protection. The results of the study conclude: (1) A notary deed will not have legal certainty if the notary as a public official (openbaar ambtenaar) who is authorized to make an authentic deed does not make a deed in accordance with applicable regulations or is carried out against the law. (2) Legal protection for a PPAT notary who makes a deed of sale and purchase based on the parties' false information is only based on the right of denial and good faith of the notary himself, if the notary does not have good faith, then the right of refusal does not apply. (3) Waiver of rights if it turns out that there is false information from the parties in accordance with Article 51 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, if the notary participates in the false information, then the notary cannot be free from punishment. Suggestions put forward: (1) The Public Prosecutor should add the related article into a claim in Article 264 Paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) and 56 Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. And there should also be a claim against the party who ordered to do this forgery and use this fake deed so that justice is truly served. (2) The Notary should be able to refuse requests from the appearers that are not in accordance with the provisions of the legislation, this is also a form of prudence of a Notary in order to avoid legal problems that will harm later. (3) Notaries should have and have good intentions to account for their actions.

Keywords


Protection; Deed; Information; Description; False.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

A Chuasanga, Ong Argo Victoria. (2019). Legal Principles Under Criminal Law in Indonesia Dan Thailand, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Vol 2, No 1 (2019) http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/4218

Alam, Bahrul., & Khisni, Akhmad. (2020). Legal Protection of Holders of Land Loss Data In The City Land Office of Kendari. JURNAL AKTA: Vol.7, No. 2, 159-164. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/7963

Arrohim, Mohammad B., & Wahyuningsih, Sri Endah. (2020). Analysis of Judicial Application of Criminal Penalty Against Notary / Land Deed Officials Conducting Making Crime of the Fake Authentic Deed in State Court of Semarang. JURNAL AKTA: Vol.7, No. 2, 183-188. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/7891

Christin Sasauw, Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kekuatan Mengikat Suatu Akta Notaris, Jurnal Lex Privatum,Vol. III/No. 1, 2015.

Deen, Thaufiq., Ong Argo Victoria & Sumain. (2018). Public Notary Services In Malaysia. JURNAL AKTA: Vol. 5, No. 4, 1017-1026. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/4135

Ong Argo Victoria, (2018) Waqf Al-Nuqūd In Indonesia (In Law Perspective), Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 5, No 1 Universitas Sultan Agung, http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/2999

Sukarmi, S., & Victoria, A. (2018). Cash Waqf in Sustaining Of Indonesian Society “In Legal & Economic Perspectiveâ€. AL-ITQAN: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC SCIENCES AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES, 2(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.31436/al-itqan.v2i1.43

Widyatmoko, â€Analisis Kritis Membedah Ketentuan Undang-undang Perubahan Atas Undangundang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 (UUJN)â€, Seminar Nasional, diselenggarakan Program Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 16 January 2014.

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2009, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Bambang Sunggono, 2003, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Habib Adjie, 2012,Bernas-bernas Pemikiran di Bidang Notaris dan PPAT, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Kansil, C.S.T., 1986, Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia, Bina Aksara, Jakarta.

Lili Rasjidi dan Putra, I. B. Wiyasa, Hukum Sebagai Suatu System, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, 2000, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum, Alumni, Bandung.

Putri AR, 2011,Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris-Indikator Tugas-Tugas Jabatan Notaris Yang Berimplikasi Perbuatan Pidana, Softmedia, Medan.

Putri A.R, 2011, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris, PT. SOFMEDIA, Jakarta.

Soesanto, 1982, Tugas Kewajiban dan hak-hak Notaris, Pradya Paramita, Jakarta.

Subekti, R., 2006, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Internusa, Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2003. Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Tan Thong Kie, 2000, Studi Notariat, PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta, 2000.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.3.1167-1177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image