The Dispute Settlement through International Arbitration between PT. Karaha Bodas Company against PT. Pertamina and PLN

Rahma Yunita Soviani, Ery Agus Priyono

Abstract


Arbitration is a dispute resolution institution that uses an adversarial approach with the result that win lose chosen as an alternative by business people. Alternative dispute resolution that is currently in demand is through arbitration because it is in line with the increase in commercial transactions in the business sector both nationally and internationally. Dispute resolution through arbitration provides benefits for the disputing parties. These advantages include the confidentiality of the disputing parties, relatively cheaper costs, a fast, efficient dispute resolution process and provide flexibility for the disputing parties. International arbitration dispute resolution has a uniqueness which adheres to the principle of final and binding (last resort and binding). An international arbitral award that has been decided abroad if it is brought to Indonesia, there are two possibilities, i.e. the International arbitral award asks to be enforced or annulled. Based on the dispute between PT. Pertamina against Karaha Bodas Company that Pertamina cannot cancel the arbitration award that has been handed down by the Swiss Arbitration Board. The reasons for rejection and cancellation are as stated in the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law.


Keywords


Arbitration; Dispute; Resolution.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Astri Marchta & M. Hudi Asrori, Proses Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Ditinjau Dari UU No.30 tahun 1999 (studi Putusan No.86/PDT.G/2002/PN.JKT.PST), Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 5, No.2, 2017.

Erni Dwita Silambi, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi dan Bisnis Melalui Arbitrase Internasional (Studi Kasus Pertamina Vs Karaha Bodas), Jurrnal Ilmu Ekonomi & Sosial, Tahun III, No.6, 2012.

Nugroho Suryo Ircham, “Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Janewa Swiss (Studi Kasus PT. Pertamina dan PT. PLN melawan Karaha Bodas Company)”, Journal Lex Renaissance No. 3 Vol. 5. Edition July 2020.

Sukwanto Bakti, Ningrum Natasya Sirait, Siregar Taufik, “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia (Pertamina Melawan Kahara Bodas Company LLC)”, Jurnal Mercatoria, Volume. 1 No. 1 (2008).

Hutrin Kamil, M.Ali Mansyur, “KAJIAN HUKUM ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR) DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999”, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum. Volume I No 2 May - August 2014, (Semarang: UNISSULA), p. 111

Mahpudin, Akhmad Khisni, Pelaksanaan Klausul Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Akad Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Indramayu, Jurnal Akta. Volume 5 No 1 March 2018, p. 150.

Dimas Pratama Yuda, Jawade Hafidz, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI TENAGA KERJA PELAUT DENGAN SISTEM KONTRAK”, Jurrnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Vol. 12 No.3 September (2017), P.55.

Dodik Hartono, Maryanto, Djauhari, Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Polda Jateng, Jurnal Daulat Hukum. Vol. 1 No. 1 March 2018, p. 55.

Wahyu Murni Setyoningsih, Achmad Sulchan, Peran Hakim Pengawas Dan Pengamat (KIMWASMAT) Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Konfrensi Ilmiah Mahasiswa UNISSULA (KIMU5), Semarang, p.55

Books:

Adolf, Huala, (2004), Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Fuady, Munir, (2000), Arbitrase (Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,

Ichsan, Akhmad, (tt), Kompedium Tentang Arbitrase Perdagangan Internasional (Luar Negeri), Cetakan Pertama, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta,

Irsan, Dwiputri, Anggie, (2011). “Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Ganti Rugi Terhadap Joint Operation Contract (JOC) yang Ditangguhkan oleh Pemerintah dalam Kasus antara Karaha Bodas Company LLC (KBC) dengan Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (PERTAMINA)”,

Subekti, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1981.

Yuhassarie Emmy & Endang Setyowati, (2003). “Rangkaian lokakarya tentang Arbitrase dan Mediasi”, diterbitkan pertama kali oleh Pusat Pengkajian Hukum bekerjasama dengan Pusdiklat Mahkamah Agung RI dan Konsultan Hukum EY, Ruru, & rekan, Jakarta,

Ronny Hanitijio Soemirto, (1995), Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri, Ghlmia

Indonesia, Jakarta,

Sembiring, Sentosa. (2006), Hukum Kepailitan dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang Terkait dengan Kepailitan, Nuansa Aulia, Bandung,

Safa’at, Rachmad. (2004), Advokasi Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa: Latar Belakang, Konsep, dan Implementasi, Surya Pena Gemilang, Malang, 2011.

Harahap, M. Yahya. ARBITRASE, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,

Internet:

Tony Budidjaja, “Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pembatalan-putusan-arbitrase-di-indonesia-hol13217, accessed on 8 June 2022.

Regulation:

Act No. 30 of 1999 concerning "Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution".

Code of Civil law

New York Convention

Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 86/PDT.G/2002/PN.JKT.PST




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v5i3.23922

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Jurnal Daulat Hukum Member of:

Image