The Practical Barriers to Auction of Confiscated Objects for Corruption Crime

Gholibuddin Zuhairmanto, Retno Saraswati, Kornelius Benuf

Abstract


This study aims to determine the implementation of the auction of confiscated objects of corruption carried out by the Kulon Progo District Attorney, as well as to find out the obstacles that exist in the process of auctioning confiscated objects of corruption. This study uses a research method with an empirical juridical approach, and a descriptive analytical research specification. This research was conducted at the Kulon Progo District Attorney's Office. The crime of corruption in recent decades has become an issue that has been widely discussed in both print and electronic media by all members of the public, because several persons suspected of committing a criminal act of corruption cannot be separated from office holders in Indonesia, consisting of executives, Legislative and even up to the Judiciary. Based on the research results, it is known that the auction implementation based on PMK No. 27/PMK.06/2016 concerning Instructions for Implementation of Auctions and PMK No. 13/PMK.06/2018 Concerning the Auction of Confiscated Objects, State Loot, or Executed Confiscated Objects Originating from the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The obstacles encountered by the Kulon Progo District Attorney's Office in the auction process, such as in the case of correspondence between the Prosecutor's Office and the KPKNL, the length of time the results of the trial came out which could result in a decrease in the value of the confiscated goods. Problems related to the implementation of electronic auctions are also still an obstacle.


Keywords


Auctions; Corruption; Crimes; Penalty.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

A. Sukris Smadi, ‘Membebaskan Positivisme Hukum Ke Ranah Hukum Progresif (Studi Pembacaan Teks Hukum Bagi Penegak Hukum)’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12.2 (2012), 331–343

Bahtiar, Lukman Farid Agus Yudha Hernoko, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Dalam Pengikatan Obyek Jaminan Berupa Surat Kuasa Jual Saat Debitor Wanprestas’, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 4.2 (2018), 114–127

Christianto, Hwian, ‘Penafsiran Hukum Progresif Dalam Perkara Pidana’, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 23.3 (2011), 483–485

KPK, Tindak Pidana Penyuapan Korporasi (Jakarta)

Muhaimin, Muhaimin, ‘Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan’, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 3.4 (2019), 23–45

Prasetyo, Agung Basuki, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Masyarakat Adat Karuhun Urang ( AKUR ) Di Desa Cigugur Kuningan Melalui Lembaga Peradilan’, Law, Development & Justice Review, 2.1 (2019), 72–84

Sarwanto, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, ‘The Role of the Government and Regional Security Safeguard Team Supervision (TP4D) In Prevention Criminal Corruption’, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3.1 (2020), 155–62

Simanjuntak., Supriardoyo, Kornelius Benuf, ‘Relevansi Nilai Ketuhanan Dan Nilai Kemanusiaan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum, 6.1 (2020), 22–46

Sukardi, ‘Penanganan Konflik Sosial Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 3.2 (2016), 41–59

Books:

Amiruddin & Zainal Asikin, (2010), Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada

Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2018), Konstitusi Keadilan Sosial : Serial Gagasan Konstitusi Sosial Negara Kesejahteraan Sosial Indonesia, Jakarta : Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2018, ISBN 978-602-412-514-1

Ahmad Kamil, (2008), Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Yurisprudensi, Jakarta: Kencana




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v5i1.18555

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Jurnal Daulat Hukum Member of:

Image