ADVOCATE ASSISTANCE AGAINST WITNESSES TOWARD THE SUSPECTED IN THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACT

Alamsyah Bahari

Abstract


In order to create a good and transparent criminal justice process so that there is no imbalance between witnesses and law enforcement officials, advocate assistance to witnesses in the investigation process in cases of corruption is necessary because not everyone has mental readiness or knowledge regarding the law in the investigation process. This study aims to provide a complete and clear description of the procedure for examining witnesses who are accused in the process of investigating cases of corruption by authorized institutions and a description of the legal basis for anti-corruption institutions in implementing the prohibition on advocacy assistance to witnesses during the process of investigating criminal cases. corruption. The research method used by researchers is the normative juridical research method. The anomaly in the attitude of the investigator appears when the advocate accompanies a witness who is asked to present it by the reported party or the suspect. Before the examination, the investigator informs the witness that the presence of an Advocate in a witness examination is not obligatory. Advocate witness assistance should also be added to be strictly regulated in the regulations, to prevent unnecessary polemics on this matter. It also includes that the witness has the right to receive a copy of the examination report.

Keywords


Advocates, Corruption Crime, Legal Protection, Suspects, Witnesses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books and Journals:

Bambang Sunoto and Jawade Hafidz, 2018, Pendampingan Penasihat Hukum Terhadap Tersangka dan Terdakwa Dalam Perkara Korupsi (Studi Kasus Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Semarang) ,

Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Volume 13, No. 1, March 2018.

Kelsen, Hans, 1961, General Theory of Law and State. Translated by: Anders Wedberg. New York: Russell & Russel.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2014, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014

Wasserman, Rhonda. Procedural Due Process: A Reference Guide to the United

States Constitution. Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Harahap Yahya, 2000, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP,

Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Herning Setyowati, 2018, and Nurul Muchiningtias, Peran Advokat Dalam Memberikan Bantuan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia, Lex Scientian Law Review, Volume 2, No. 2, November 2018.

Hiarirj Edy O.S, 2015, Hukum Acara Pidana, Tangerang Selatan:Universitas Terbuka.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih and Agus Sunaryo, 2017, The Role of Prosecutor Office In The Eradication Of Corruption Criminal Acts in Indonesia. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum , Volume IV, Issue 2, Agustus 2017.

Surastini Fitriasih, “Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Sebagai Sarana Menuju Proses Peradilan (Pidana) Yang Jujur Dan Adilâ€, http/www. antikorupsi.org/mod =tema & op = view article &artid, diakses tanggal 22 april2018.

Suratno, 2017, Perlindungan Hukum Saksi dan Korban Sebagai Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborators pada Pengungkapan Kasus Korupsi Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum , Volume IV, Issue 1,April 2017.Viktor K Pesik,Kewenangan KPK Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Et Societatis , Volume II, Issue 6, July 2014.

Indonesia. 1945 Constitution

Indonesia. Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law

Indonesia. Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (HAM)

Indonesia. Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission.

Indonesia. Law No.13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection.

Indonesia. Law No. 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates Indonesia. Chief of Police Regulation No. 8 of 2009 concerning the Implementation of Human Rights Principles and Standards in carrying out the Duties of the Indonesian National Police.

http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt53608673190e8/siapa-saja-yangberwenang-menetapkan-saksi-menjadi-tersangka, accessed on date 22nd April 2018.

http://www.jurnas.com/artikel/20806/KPK-Keliru-Larang-Saksi-dan-TersangkaDidampingi-Pengacara/, accessed on date 16th April 2018.

https://www.kricom.id/hindari-tudingan-intimidasi-kpk-harus-perbolehkan-saksididampingi-pengacara/feed/, accessed on date 16th April 2018.

http://www.jurnas.com/artikel/20806/KPK-Keliru-Larang-Saksi-dan-TersangkaDidampingi-Pengacara/, accessed on date 16th April 2018

https://www.kricom.id/hindari-tudingan-intimidasi-kpk-harus-perbolehkan-saksididampingi-pengacara/feed/, accessed on date 16th April 2018




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v7i1.4044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda base dimension DOAJ sinta
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a