SMALL CLAIM COURT : PRINCIPLE CONCRETIZATION IN LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT

Peni Rinda

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to examine the provisions of civil procedural law in settling a lawsuit, to know the form of simple, fast, and low-cost concretization in simple lawsuit settlement. The research method uses the research object of simple, fast, and low-cost concretization in the settlement of a simple claim, normative juridical approach, the type of data used in this study is secondary data, which is sourced from the literature. Secondary data consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, legal material collection techniques carried out by literature and the internet, while the data analysis method is analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results show that the provisions of civil procedural law in resolving claims in court so far have been using the basis of HIR, which do not differentiate between complicated and simple case examinations so that the time for settlement is the same. The process starting from submitting/registering a lawsuit, determining the day of trial by the head of the panel of judges, the parties being summoned appropriately, the trial, evidence to the verdict took a long time, namely 6 months (SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR No. 6 of 1992), so the Supreme Court issued SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR No. 2 of 2014 which provides a time limit for completing the case of five (5) months. The simple, fast, and low-cost principles of concretizing a small claim court can be seen in the settlement stage. Settlement of a simple lawsuit is divided into 4 (four) stages, namely: 1), preliminary stage, 2) stage of case examination, 3). The objection request stage and 4), the simple action decision stage. This simple lawsuit settlement process should take a maximum of 25 (twenty-five) days. The simple principle is embodied in the shortened settlement process mechanism, the fast principle is realized within 25 days of completion, a peace that does not use the provisions of Supreme Court rules No.1 of 2016, while the principle of low cost is realized from a simple settlement mechanism, will be affected by the cost of the case.


Keywords


Concretization; Cost; Lawsuit; Principle; Simple.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Journals

Anita Afriana, Application of Short Events and Fast Procedures in Civil Dispute Resolution in Courts: A Political Review of Civil Procedural Law Journal of Civil Procedural Law, Vol. 1, No. 1, of 2015

Arman Tjoneng, Simple Lawsuit as a Breakthrough of the Supreme Court in Resolving Case Stacking in Courts and Its Problems , Dialogia Iuridica: Journal of Iuridical Dialogia. Vol. 8 No. 2, April 2017.

Benny Riyanto, Hapsari Tunjung Sekartaji, Empowerment of Civil Cases Simple Lawsuits to Realize Judicial Administration based on Simple, Fast and Low Cost Principles, Journal of Legal Issues, Volume 48 No. 1, January 2019.

Chief Justice Michael Black, ‘The Role of the Judge in Attaching Endemic Delays: Some Lessons from Fast Track, Journal of Judicial Administration Vol. 88, Number 19, page 88, 2009

David Spencer, Judicial Mediators: Is the Time Right?, Australian Dispute Resolution Journal Vol. 17, No, 6, 2006.

James J Spigelman, Mediation and the Court, Law Society Journal, Vol. 39, No.2, 2001.

Justice Ronald Sackville, The Future of Case Management in Litigation, Journal of Judicial Administration, Vol. 18, No. 211, page 212, 2009.

Nevey Varida Ariani, Simple Lawsuits and the Judicial System in Indonesia ", DE JURE Legal Research Journal, ISSN 1410-5632 Vol. 18 No. 3, September 2018,

Sherly Ayuna Putri, Civil Dispute Resolution through a Simple Lawsuit Based on Supreme Court rules, Journal of Unpad Community Service. Vol. 8, No.2 of 2015.

Uswatun Hasanah, Mohammad Amir Hamzah, Indien Winarwati, Development of Non-Litigation Civil Dispute Settlement Model Based on Madurese Local Wisdom to Reduce Cases Accumulation in Court, Brawijaya Law Journal, , Vol. 6, No. 1, 2019. Page 116

B. Books

Muhammad Saleh and Lilik Mulyadi, 2012, Ketertarikan Hukum Acara Perdata Perspektif Teoritis, Praktek dan Masalah, Alumni, Bandung.

M. Natsir Asnawi, 2016, Hukum Acara Perdata Teori Praktek dan masalah Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama, Yogyakarta, UUI-Pre ss.

Retnowulan Sutantio and Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, 1997, Hukum Acara Perdata Teori and Praktek, Bandung, CV Mandar advanced.

Ridwan Mansyur and DY Witanto, 2017, Teori Praktek Gugatan Sederhana dan Permasalahannya, Jakarta, Pustaka Dunia.

Sudikno Martokusumo, 2010, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Atma Jaya University.

C. Regulations

Constitution of Indonesia of 1945

Act No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power

Het Herziene Indonesich Reglement

Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Simple Lawsuits.

Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts.

Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2019 concerning Amendments to the Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Simple Lawsuits.

Supreme Court Circular No. 6 of 1992 concerning Case Settlement in High Court and District Court.

Supreme Court Circular No. 2 of 2014 concerning Case Settlement in the First Level Courts and the Appeal Level in 4 (four) Judicial Environments.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i3.18493

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda sinta base dimension DOAJ
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a