THE LOSS OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE (BUMN) AS NOT STATE LOSS IN SEPARATION PRINCIPLE PERSPECTIVE

Siska Ambarwati, Yuliati Yuliati, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti

Abstract


The study aims to analyze, first, the BUMN sub-holding loss as a state loss and secondly, the responsibility of the BUMN holding company for the BUMN sub-holding loss. There is a dualism in the conception of state assets that are separated from BUMN in Indonesian laws and regulations. The research methods was normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The shares of BUMN sub-holding don’t come from the state but come from the BUMN and also the public. The capital investment which it does by the BUMN holding company to the BUMN sub-holding doesn’t make the BUMN sub-holding become a BUMN. In the Group Company, the principle of a separate entity continues to apply which leads to the principle of limited liability holding as a subsidiary shareholder. However, if BUMN as the majority shareholder has the right to actively intervene and it is proven that there is control of the company, then the principle of piercing the corporate vision can be applied. So the BUMN holding company must be responsible for BUMN sub-holding because of the control carried out by these BUMN holding companies. The results show that the BUMN sub-holding loss isn’t state loss.


Keywords


BUMN; Companies; Corruption; Finance; Holding; Loss; State.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Abdul Latif, Tafsir Hakim terhadap Unsur Melawan Hukum Pasca Putusan MK atas Pengajuan UU PTPK, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7 No. 3 June 2010 (doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x );

Afida Ainur Rokfa, et. all, Kedudukan Hukum Kekayaan BUMN Persero dalam Pelaksanaan Sita Umum Akibat Kepailitan, Jurnal Ilmu Kenoktariatan, Volume 1 No. 1 February 2020 (doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v1i1.18229);

Bayu Novendra & Aulia Mutiara Syifa, Miskonsepsi Pembebanan Tanggung Jawab kepada Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara dalam Jerat Tindak Pidana Korupsiâ€, Sasi, Volume 26 No. 4 October-December 2020 (doi: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.298);

Budi Suhariyanto, “Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan mahkamah Konnstitusi oleh Mahkamah Agungâ€, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 13 No. 1 March 2016 (URL: https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/issue/download/31/61);

Henny Juliani, Kedudukan Kekayaan Negara yang Dipisahkan pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), Masalah-masalah Hukum, Volume 45 No. 4 July 2016 (doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.299-306);

Inda Rahadiyan, Kedudukan BUMN Persero sebagai Separate Legal Entity dalam Kaitannya dengan Pemisahan Keuangan Negara pada Permodalan BUMN, Ius Quia Iustum, Volume 20 No. 4 October 2013 (doi: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss4.art7);

Julio Thimotius Kapitan Smaud Natun, Status Kepemilikan Anak Perusahaan BUMN, Mimbar Keadilan, Volume 12 No. 1 February-July 2019 (doi: https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i1.2161);

M. Iqbal Asnawi, Implikasi Pengelolaan BUMN Persero dalam Kerangka Welfare State Berdasarkan Mekanisme Perseroan Terbatas, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Volume 2 No. 1 January-June 2016, (URL: https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jhsk/article/view/32/13);

Merdiansa Paputungan, Diskursus Kewenangan Audit BPK terhadap Keuangan BUMN (Perseroan) Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 62/PUU-XI/2013, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 29 No. 3 October 2017, (doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.26884);

Miranda Chairunnisa, et. all, Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan Induk terhadap Perusahaan Anak dalam Hal Terjadinya Pencemaran dan/atau Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup, USU Law Journal, Volume 2 No. 2 November 2013 (URL: https://jurnal.usu.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/5321);

Ni’matul Huda, Problematika Pengaturan Tindak Lanjut Putusan mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perkara Pidana oleh Mahkamah Agung, Ius Quia Iustum, Volume 21 No. 3 October 2020 (doi: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss3.art1);

RidwanKhairandy, Korupsi di Badan Usaha Milik Negara Khususnya Perusahaan Perseroan: Suatu Kajian atas Makna Kekayaan Negara yang Dipisahkan & Keuangan Negara, Ius Quia Iustum Volume 16 No. I January 2009, (doi: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss1.art5);

Rizal Choirul Ramadhan, Kedudukan Hukum Badan Usaha Milik Negara Sebagai Anak Perusahaan Dalam Perusahaan Holding Induk, Media Iuris, Volume 4 No. 1 February 2021 (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mi.v4i1.23669);

Sartika Nanda Lestari, Business Judgment Rule sebagai Immunity Doctrine bagi Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Indonesia, Notarius, Volume 8 No. 2 September 2015 (doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v8i2.10261);

Tami Rusli, Tanggungjawab Organ BUMN dalam Pengelolaan Kekayaan BUMN Dikaitkan dengan hak Negara sebagai Pemegang Saham, Pranata Hukum, Volume 14 No.1 January 2019 (doi: https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v14i1.157);

Tina Amelia, Tanggung Jawab Terbatas Induk Perusahaan BUMN terhadap Anak Perusahaan BUMN Pra & Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01/PHPU-PRES/XVIII/2019 tahun 2019, Sol Justicia, Volume 3 No. 2 Desember 2020 (URL: http://ojs.ukb.ac.id/index.php/sj/article/view/284).

Books:

Ahmad Yani & Gunawan Widjaja, 2008, Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;

Andi Hamzah, 2008, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Revision of Third Edition, PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta;

Arifin P. Soeria Atmadja, 2010, Keuangan Publik dalam Perspektif Hukum: Teori, Praktik, & Kritik, Third Edition, Rajawali Press, Jakarta;

D.Y. Witanto, 2012, Dimensi Kerugian Negara Dalam Hubungan Kontraktual (Suatu Tinjauan Terhadap Risiko Kontrak Dalam Proyek Pemerintahan barang/Jasa Instansi Pemerintah), Cetakan Pertama, CV Mandar Maju, Bandung;

Johny Ibrahim, 2012, Teori & Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang, Bayumedia;

Munir Fuady 2008, Hukum Perusahaan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

Ni’matul Huda, 2014, Perkembangan Hukum Tata Negara Perdebatan & Gagasan Penyempurnaan, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta;

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Penelitiаn hukum, Kencаnа, Jakarta;

Sudarto, 1983, Hukum & Perkembangan Masyarakat, Sinar Baru, Bandung

Suhendar, 2015, Konsep Kerugian Keuangan Negara: Pendekatan Hukum Pidana, Hukum Administrasi Negara, & Pidana Khusus Korupsi, Cetakan Pertama, Setara Press, Malang;

Stephen W. Mayson, Derek French, & Christopher Ryan, 1989, Company Law, sixth edition, Blackstone Press Limited, London;

Sulistiowati, 2010, Aspek Hukum & Realitas Bisnis Perusahaan Grup di Indonesia, Jakarta, Penerbit Erlangga;

Yahya harahap, 2019, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Yos Johan Utama, 2015, Memahami & Menghindari Perbuatan Merugikan Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi & Pencucian Uang, Thafamedia, Yogyakarta;

Zaeni Ashyhadie & Budi Sutrisno, 2012, Hukum Perusahaan & Kepailitan, Erlangga, Jakarta;

Research:

Frans Affandhi, Business Judgment Rule Dikaitkan dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara terhadap Keputusan Bisnis yang Diambil, LL.M. Thesis, Sumatera Utara University, 2015;

Lugis Anfi, Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Kedudukan Hukum Anak Perusahaan BUMN terhadap BUMN, Bachelor Thesis, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Salatiga, 2020;

Parameshwara, Kriminalisasi terhadap Direksi dalam Pengurusan Perseroan Terbatas, Ph.D. Thesis, Sumatera Utara University, 2017;

Rochmad Abu Bakar, Analisis Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Direksi Holding Badan Usaha Milik Negara atas Kerugian Investasi Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara dalam Kaitannya dengan Kerugian Negara (Studi Kasus: Investasi PT. Pertamina melalui PT. Pertamina Hulu Energi di Australia), LL.M. Thesis, Gajah Mada University, 2019.

Paper:

Erman Rajagukguk, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Risiko Pengambilan Keputusan Yang Diambil Oleh Direktur & Komisaris, paper presented at the Discussion Panel “Governance & Risk of Criminalization: Cases in the Telecommunications Industry†organized by the Indonesian Institute of Commissioners & Directors (LKDI), in Jakarta, 30 April 2014.

Internet:

Dipura, Aria. 2020. “Tinjauan Hukum Mengenai Status Anak Perusahaan BUMNâ€, Available on Website: https://www.ybp-law.com/tinjauan-hukum-mengenai-status-anak-bumn/, Accessed April 28th, 2021.

Taher, Andrian Pratama. March 10th. 2020. Available on Website: “MA Vonis Bebas eks Dirut Pertamina Karen Agustiawanâ€, https://tirto.id/ma-vonis-bebas-eks-dirut-pertamina-karen-agustiawan-eD27, Accessed November 6th, 2020.

Regulation:

Act No. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 Number 5, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4355);

Act No. 17 of 2003 concerning State Finances (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2003 Number 59, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4286);

Act No. 19 of 2003 concerning State-Owned Enterprises (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2003 Number 70, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4297);

Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Amendments to Act No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150);

Act No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2007 Number 106, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4756);

Constitution of 1945 Republic of Indonesia;

Constitutional Court Decision Number 48/PU-XI/2013;

Decision Number 121 K/Pid.Sus/2020.

Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 62/PUU-XI/2013 concerning Material Testing Article 2 letter g and letter i of Act No. 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance; and Article 6 paragraph (1), Article 9 paragraph (1) letter b, Article 10 paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) letter b, and Article 11 letter a of Act No. 15 of 2006 concerning the State Audit Board;

Regulation of the Minister of State-Owned Enterprises Number 3 of 2012 concerning Guidelines for Appointing Members of the Board of Directors and Members of the Board of Commissioners of Subsidiaries of State-Owned Enterprises.

Supreme Court Decision Number 21P/HUM/2017;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.16148

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda sinta base dimension DOAJ
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a