LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF REGULATORY PROVISIONS ARTICLE 10 VERSE (5) LAW NO. 46 OF 2009 CONCERNING THE CORRUPTION CRIMINAL COURT

Ahmad Fauzi, Abdul Madjid, Nurini Aprilianda, Prija Djatmika

Abstract


The corruption criminal court is an institution that is given the authority to examine and decide corruption cases. The purpose of this study was to determine the juridical implications of the principle of the independence of the judicial power. This study uses a normative approach with quantitative analysis. The existence of a corruption court established on judicial power states that a special court can only be formed by a separate law. Then the corruption court is an institution that has the authority to examine and decide corruption cases. In its implementation, the composition of judges in the corruption court is divided into two, namely career judges and ad hoc judges. In its implementation, there are several things in the legislation that are contrary to the principle of independence of judicial power and violate the principle of freedom of judicial power, especially for ad hoc judges in the criminal court of corruption.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Djohansyah. J, Reformasi Mahkamah Agung Menuju Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman, (Bekasi, Kesaint Blanck, 2008),

Dworkin, Ronald, Talking Right Seriously, (London, Gerald Duckworth&Co, 1977),

Holl, Anthony&Marc Loth. Reshaping Justice, Judicial Reform and Adjudication In The Netherland (Two Concepts Of The Legal Profession), (Maastrich Shaker Publishing B.V, 2004).

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (edisi kedua) Depertemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, (Jakarta, Balai Pustaka, 1991)

Kaligis, O.C, Antologi Tulisan Ilmu Hukum Jilid 6, (Bandung, PT. Alumni, 2011)

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Bunga Rampai Refleksi Satu Tahun Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, ( Jakarta, Sekertariat Jendral Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2006).

Mahfud MD, Membangun Politik Hukum Konstitusi, (Jakarta, Pustaka LP3ES, 2002).

Manan, Bagir, Prasyarat Kemerdekaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum Tahun XXX No. 348 November 2014.

Marzuki, Suparman, Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dan Konteks Politik Hukum Kekkuasaan Kehakiam: Dalam Hitam Putih Pengadilan Khusus, (Jakarta, Komisi Yudisial,2016)

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Ilmu Hukum Di Tengah Arus Perubahan, (Malang, Surya Pena Gemilang Publishing, 2016)

Rifai, Ahmad, Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika,) 2010,




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v7i3.12937

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda sinta base dimension DOAJ
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a